Computing sig8 for correction in non-linear regime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the cosmological parameter ##\sigma_{8}## using the CAMB code, specifically addressing corrections between linear and non-linear regimes. The user seeks to determine the appropriate value for the tophat filter radius ##R_{8}##, currently set at ##11.94##, and questions the accuracy of their computed ##\sigma_{8}## value of ##0.8411## compared to the standard value of ##0.8155##. It is confirmed that CAMB version 1.0.12 can directly output ##\sigma_{8}##, and the user is also interested in semi-analytical methods using Fortran90.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological parameters, specifically ##\sigma_{8}##.
  • Familiarity with the CAMB code, version 1.0.12.
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and Bessel functions.
  • Proficiency in Fortran90 programming language.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of the get_matter_transfer_data() function in CAMB.
  • Explore semi-analytical methods for computing ##\sigma_{8}## using Fortran90.
  • Investigate the effects of varying ##R_{8}## on the computed values of ##\sigma_{8}##.
  • Study the relationship between power spectrum and ##\sigma_{8}## sensitivity in cosmological models.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers working on cosmological simulations or parameter estimation, particularly those utilizing CAMB and Fortran90 for their analyses.

fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
In the context of the sudy of C_l's stability for Fisher formalism, I need to apply, with CAMB code, a correction on 𝜎8 between linear and non-linear regime to keep it fixed (I make change the values of cosmological parameters at each iteration).
I need to apply, with CAMB code, a correction on ##\sigma_{8}## between linear and non-linear regime to keep it fixed (I make change the values of cosmological parameters at each iteration). I have to compute ##\sigma_{8}## from the ##P_{k}## and found the following relation (I put also the text for clarify the context) :
Part of this Klein Onderzoek is aimed at finding an estimate of the cosmological parameter ##\sigma_{8}## from peculiar verlocity data only. ##\sigma_{8}## is defined as the r.m.s. density variation when smoothed with a tophat-filter of radius of ##8 \mathrm{h}^{-1} \mathrm{Mpc} .[9]## The definition of ##\sigma_{8}## in formula-form is given by:

##\sigma_{8}^{2}=\frac{1}{2 \pi^{2}} \int W_{s}^{2} k^{2} P(k) d k##

where ##W_{s}## is tophat filter function in Fourier space:

##W_{s}=\frac{3 j_{1}\left(k R_{8}\right)}{k R_{8}}##

where ##j_{1}## is the first-order spherical Bessel function. The parameter ##\sigma_{8}## is mainly sensitive to the power spectrum in a certain range of ##k## -values. For large ##k,## the filter function will become negligible and the integral will go to zero. For small ##k,## the factor ##k^{2}## in combination with the power spectrum factor ##k^{-3}## will make sure that the integral is negligible.

In other words, ##\sigma_{8}## is mostly determined by the power spectrum within the approximate range ##0.1 \leq k \leq 2 .## since ##\sigma_{8}## is only sensitive to a certain range of ##k,## any difference in the values of the Hubble uncertaintenty, the baryonic matter density and the total matter density will influence the found estimate.
Question 1) What numerical value have I got to take for ##R_{8}## in my code : for the instant, I put ##R_{8}= 8.0/0.67=11.94## : is this correct ?Question 2) The other issue is, for each correction on ##A_{s}##, that I find with this expression a value roughly around : ##\sigma_{8} = 0.8411 ...## instead of standard (fiducial) value ##\sigma_{8} = 0.8155 ...## : there is a 4 percent of difference between both values : is the expression above right ?Could anyone tell me a good way to compute ##\sigma_{8}## from ##P_{k}## generated by CAMB-1.0.12 ? Thanks in advanceRegards
 
Space news on Phys.org
Thanks, isn't there a way to do it with a semi-analytical method since I am using mostly the Fortran90 source files ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K