Concentration boundary layer thickness

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between concentration boundary layer thickness and air velocity in the context of mass transfer over a stagnant water surface. The user identifies a correlation involving the Reynolds number and Schmidt number, suggesting that these parameters can be used to scale the concentration boundary layer thickness. It is established that momentum, concentration, and thermal boundary layers are distinct, with varying thicknesses influenced by flow conditions. The importance of consulting comprehensive literature on boundary layer theory is emphasized for a deeper understanding of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of boundary layer theory
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number and Schmidt number
  • Knowledge of mass transfer principles
  • Basic concepts of fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the first chapter on laminar boundary layer flow in boundary layer theory textbooks
  • Research the relationship between Reynolds number and Schmidt number in mass transfer contexts
  • Explore advanced topics related to the Sherwood number for mass transfer
  • Review the provided resource on leaf boundary layer resistances for practical insights
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in fluid dynamics, environmental science, and chemical engineering who are investigating mass transfer phenomena and boundary layer interactions.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
948
Reaction score
48
Hello,

I'm doing an experiment where I will be blowing warm air parallel to a stagnant water surface, and I will investigate the scaling of air velocity with mass transfer coefficient. I am trying to find some kind of scaling of the concentration boundary layer thickness with air velocity, and have been unable to find any literature that gives that scaling. Anyone know what that relationship is, or where I can find it? Thanks.
upload_2015-10-18_15-6-50.png

I should note I have found derivations of the momentum boundary layer thickness, but not the concentration. Perhaps there is some correlation between momentum and concentration boundary layer thickness?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I found some powerpoint slides. It can be correlated with the Reynold's number and Schmidt number to various powers multiplied by some constant. As a follow up, I understand that the momentum, concentration, and thermal boundary layer thicknesses are not the same, but I wonder if these are real or are they just concepts used to explain the phenomena. How can one layer of air be thicker than another layer, like they are overlapping each other? Seems strange.
 
Maylis said:
As a follow up, I understand that the momentum, concentration, and thermal boundary layer thicknesses are not the same, but I wonder if these are real or are they just concepts used to explain the phenomena. How can one layer of air be thicker than another layer, like they are overlapping each other? Seems strange.

Suppose you have air flow over a solid object but there is no temperature difference between the air and the object. The thermal boundary layer thickness will be zero, but the momentum thickness will have some finite value. The momentum boundary layer says something about how far away from the object your velocity reaches the free-stream velocity. The thermal boundary layer says something about how far away from the object your temperature reaches the free-stream temperature. These boundary layers are usually not the same.

Please, do not depend only on powerpoint slides for such a difficult topic. There are very good books on boundary layer flows and the questions you ask are all covered by most of these books. Finding out why the Sherwood number for mass transfer looks the way it does is an advanced topic, but for the quoted questions above, you can study the first chapter on laminar boundary layer flow in any book that covers boundary layer theory
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gfd43tg
Maylis said:
I should note I have found derivations of the momentum boundary layer thickness, but not the concentration. Perhaps there is some correlation between momentum and concentration boundary layer thickness?

While not directly applicable to your problem, this I found gives a brief synopsis of how some of the boundary layers work.

http://nature.berkeley.edu/biometlab/espm129/notes/Lecture%2024%20Leaf%20Boundary%20Layer%20Resistances%20and%20Mass%20and%20Momentum%20Exchange%20notes.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gfd43tg

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
887
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K