Concept of Invertible Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter war485
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of invertible matrices, specifically focusing on the equation Ax = b and its consistency based on the invertibility of matrix A.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of A being invertible on the equation Ax = b, questioning whether the consistency of the equation holds true regardless of A's invertibility. Some participants attempt to clarify the conditions under which solutions exist.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the relationship between the invertibility of matrix A and the existence of solutions to Ax = b. Participants are providing insights and clarifications, but no consensus has been reached regarding the implications of invertibility.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the definitions and conditions related to the equation Ax = b, indicating a need for further clarification on the concepts of invertibility and solution existence.

war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If A is an invertible square matrix, then Ax = b is consistent for each b in R^n

2. The attempt at a solution

If A multiplied by A inverse is identity, then it would always be consistent. So I thought , if A is just randomly multiplied by some x, then it will still be consistent right? I can't seem to find anything wrong with the statement above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

Ax=b is not exactly 'true' if there no solutions x to the equation given a b. If A is invertible then A^(-1)Ax=Ix=x=A^(-1)b. So given any b, x=A^(-1)b. Yes, it's consistent.
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

I have no idea what you mean by this. What is "Ax= b" that it could "hold true"? Certainly if A is a matrix and x a vector with as many components as A has columns, then there exist a vector b such that Ax= b. Is that what you meant?

If A is invertible, then given any such vector b, there exist a vector x such that Ax= b.

If A is not invertible then, given b, there may not exist such an x or there may exist an infinite number of the them.
 
Thanks for the help guys. That little algebra helped me see it properly Dick.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K