Concept of Invertible Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter war485
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Matrices
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If A is an invertible square matrix, then Ax = b is consistent for each b in R^n

2. The attempt at a solution

If A multiplied by A inverse is identity, then it would always be consistent. So I thought , if A is just randomly multiplied by some x, then it will still be consistent right? I can't seem to find anything wrong with the statement above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

Ax=b is not exactly 'true' if there no solutions x to the equation given a b. If A is invertible then A^(-1)Ax=Ix=x=A^(-1)b. So given any b, x=A^(-1)b. Yes, it's consistent.
 
cse63146 said:
I think Ax = b holds true regardless of A being invertible or not

I have no idea what you mean by this. What is "Ax= b" that it could "hold true"? Certainly if A is a matrix and x a vector with as many components as A has columns, then there exist a vector b such that Ax= b. Is that what you meant?

If A is invertible, then given any such vector b, there exist a vector x such that Ax= b.

If A is not invertible then, given b, there may not exist such an x or there may exist an infinite number of the them.
 
Thanks for the help guys. That little algebra helped me see it properly Dick.