Conceptual question - block and incline

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass 1.62 kg sliding down a frictionless incline and raises questions about the forces acting on the block at various points, particularly at the bottom of the incline and the implications of centripetal force in a circular motion context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the block, questioning the role of air resistance and the nature of the normal force at point A. There is exploration of whether the normal force is simply equal to mg or if it also includes components related to inertial forces and centripetal force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions made in the problem statement and exploring the relationship between normal force and centripetal force. Some guidance has been offered regarding the direction of forces and the need to consider additional forces acting on the block.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding the radius of curvature (R) of the track, which participants note limits their ability to find numerical values related to the forces involved.

deedsy
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




a block of mass m = 1.62kg slides down a frictionless incline.the block is raised a height h = 3.91m above the bottom of theloop.
(a) what is the force of the inclined track on the block atthe bottom (point A)?
(b) what is the force of the track on the block at pointB?
(c) at what speed does the block leave the track?
(d) how far way from point A does the block land on levelground?
(e) sketch the potential energy U(x) of the block. indicatethe total energy on the sketch


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to work out this problem, but I don't understand why the force of the inclined track on the block at the bottom depends on air resistance. At the flat, bottom, the force diagram should just conclude N=mg, but I'm told there is a retarding force dependent on v as well. This retarding force seems like it should be to the left, and would have no relation to the normal force.
 

Attachments

  • 452cf8b880c280c1683d3a65d5a7b636.jpg
    452cf8b880c280c1683d3a65d5a7b636.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 713
Physics news on Phys.org
? The problem states that the track is frictionless, and there is no mention made of air resistance...

Looks like you'll just have the forces due to gravity and inertial forces due to motion to deal with (pay attention to the geometry of the lower portion of the track).
 
gneill said:
? The problem states that the track is frictionless, and there is no mention made of air resistance...

Looks like you'll just have the forces due to gravity and inertial forces due to motion to deal with (pay attention to the geometry of the lower portion of the track).

So should the answer to part A simply be m*g? Or is there a component of the inertial force in the y-direction too?
 
deedsy said:
So should the answer to part A simply be m*g? Or is there a component of the inertial force in the y-direction too?

What might be a cause of an inertial force acting at A? Hint: the answer for (a) is not just m*g.
 
gneill said:
What might be a cause of an inertial force acting at A? Hint: the answer for (a) is not just m*g.

ooo is it the centripetal force?

So at point A, N - mg = mv^2/r

Thank you very much for helping me
 
Last edited:
deedsy said:
ooo is it the centripetal force?

So at point A, N = mg + mv^2/r

or is it mg - mv^2/r since the force is directed towards the center of the circle like the normal force

Yes, centripetal force. Regarding the direction, the centripetal force is acting in the same direction as the normal force, and it's the normal force that you're looking for, right? (check the question statement). The track has to provide the centripetal force IN ADDITION to supporting the block's gravitational weight...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Is there a way to find the numerical value of R?
 
skeer said:
Is there a way to find the numerical value of R?
If it's not explicitly given (and it is not), and if there is not some related value from which we could deduce it (and there is not) then no, we can't find a numerical value for R :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: skeer

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K