Conceptual Solution of a First Order PDE

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual solution of a first order partial differential equation (PDE) of the form $$ \partial_t u(t,x) + a(x) \cdot \nabla u(x) =0 $$ with a given initial condition. Participants explore the reasoning behind the solution method, including the use of flow generated by a vector field and the relationship between the solution and the initial condition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines a method for solving the PDE using an ordinary differential equation related to the flow generated by the vector field $$ a(x) $$.
  • The participant defines a function $$ w(s) = u(s,X(s)) $$ and derives that $$ u(t,X(t,y)) = u_0(y) $$, leading to the conclusion that $$ u(t,x) = u_0(X(-t,x)) $$.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the reasoning and states that if $$ g^t(x) $$ is the flow generated by $$ a(x) $$, then $$ u(t,x) = u_0(g^{-t}(x)) $$ is a solution to the Cauchy problem.
  • There is a reiteration of the previous point, with an additional note that $$ g^{-t}(x) $$ can also be interpreted as the flow generated by $$ -a(x) $$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the proposed solution method and the relationship between the flow and the solution to the PDE. However, the discussion does not explore any competing views or unresolved issues.

Contextual Notes

None noted.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the theoretical aspects of first order PDEs, mathematical modeling, and the application of vector fields in solving differential equations may find this discussion beneficial.

Gallo
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello I would like to check my reasoning about solutions of first order PDE. I've spell out (almost) all details.

I'll consider the following problem: find ##u=u(t,x)## s.t. :
$$ \partial_t u(t,x) + a(x) \cdot \nabla u(x) =0 \qquad \qquad u(0,x) = u_0(x)$$
say with smooth coefficient and initial condition (I'm not too much worried about local existence etc..).

Next I consider the following ordinary differential equation:
$$ \dot{X}(s) = a(X(s)) \qquad X(0) = y$$
whose solution ## X(s,p)## satisfies:
$$ X(t+s,y) = X(t,X(s,y))$$
and ##X(0,y)=y ##.

Then If I define ## w(s) = u(s,X(s))##, it must be:
$$ \frac{d w(s)}{d s} = \partial_t u(s,X(s)) + a(X(s)) \cdot \nabla u(X(s)) = 0$$
that is on the curves ##X(s)##:
$$u(t,X(t,y)) = w(t) = w(0) = u(0,X(0,y)) = u_0(y) .$$

Now given ## x## I need to find ## y## such that ## x = X(t,y) ##. If I consider ## X(-t,x)##, then:
$$ X(-t,x) = X(-t,X(t,y)) = X(t-t,y) = y$$
This means that ## u## is given by:
$$ u(t,x) = u_0(X(-t,x))$$

Moreover if I define ##\tilde{X}(s,y) = X(-s,y)##, then it solves:
$$ \dot{\tilde{X}}(s) = - a(\tilde{X}(s)) \qquad \tilde{X}(0) = y$$
so that the final form of the solution can also be given by
$$ u(t,x) = u_0(\tilde{X}(t,x))$$

Is this correct?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct. Indeed if ##g^t(x)## is a flow generated by the vector field ##a(x)## then a function ##u(t,x)=u_0(g^{-t}(x))## is a solution to the following Cauchy problem
$$u_t+a^i\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^i}=0,\quad u\mid_{t=0}=u_0(x).$$
To obtain this fact it is sufficient to differentiate the equality
$$u(t,g^t(y))=u_0(y)$$ in time and then put ##y=g^{-t}(x)##

##u(t,x)## is a first integral to the system ##\dot x=a(x)##
 
Last edited:
zwierz said:
It looks correct. Indeed if ##g^t(x)## is a flow generated by the vector field ##a(x)## then a function ##u(t,x)=u_0(g^{-t}(x))## is a solution to the following Cauchy problem
$$u_t+a^i\frac{\partial u}{\partial x^i}=0,\quad u\mid_{t=0}=u_0(x).$$
To obtain this fact it is sufficient to differentiate the equality
$$u(t,g^t(y))=u_0(y)$$ in time and then put ##y=g^{-t}(x)##

##u(t,x)## is a first integral to the system ##\dot x=a(x)##

Also it can also be said that ##g^{-t}(x)## is the flow generated by ##-a(x)##, correct?
 
yes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
684
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K