Condition of Chaos: Ljapunov Exponent & Strange Attractor

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mersecske
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chaos Condition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Lyapunov exponent and strange attractors in chaotic systems. A positive Lyapunov exponent is established as a condition for chaos, while strange attractors are identified as manifestations of chaotic behavior. The conversation seeks to clarify whether these two conditions are equivalent and explores necessary and sufficient conditions for chaos, specifically mentioning topological mixing and sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Additionally, participants inquire about the proof of non-invertibility as a necessary condition for chaos in one-dimensional systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lyapunov exponents in dynamical systems
  • Familiarity with strange attractors and their properties
  • Knowledge of topological mixing in chaotic systems
  • Concept of sensitive dependence on initial conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the equivalence of Lyapunov exponents and strange attractors in chaos theory
  • Study theorems related to topological mixing and chaos
  • Examine proofs of non-invertibility as a necessary condition for chaos in one-dimensional systems
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamical systems, focusing on chaotic behavior and attractors
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and researchers in chaos theory, particularly those interested in dynamical systems and the mathematical foundations of chaos.

mersecske
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Usually positive Ljapunov exponent is said to be a condition for chaos,
and the strange atractor is so.

Are there any theorem which shows that the two condition is equivalent?
They are necessary and sufficent conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The necessary conditions for chaos are topological mixing and sensitive dependence of initial conditions.
 
Where can I find a precise statement and proof of "non-invertibility is necessary condition for chaos in 1D" ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K