How Is the Distribution of B_s Given B_t Computed in Brownian Motion?

Click For Summary
The distribution of B_s given B_t in standard Brownian motion is computed as a normal distribution for 0 ≤ s < t. The discussion highlights the need for precise phrasing in describing this computation, suggesting it can be framed as the distribution of B_s over σ(B_t). It emphasizes the importance of partitioning distributions to avoid overlap. Utilizing properties of Wiener processes provides sufficient justification for the computation. Overall, the conversation centers on accurately articulating the statistical relationships in Brownian motion.
IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I computed the distribution of B_s given B_t, where 0\leq s &lt;t and \left\{B_t\right\}_{t\geq 0} is a standard brownian motion. It's normal obviously..

My question is, how do I phrase what I've done exactly? Is it that I computed the distribution of B_s over \sigma(B_t)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey IniquiTrance.

If you partition the distributions so that they don't overlap then you can use the properties of a Wiener (or Brownian motion) process and that should be enough in terms of the justification used.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K