MHB Conditional probability: Eye color of sibling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the conditional probability of a second child being "bb" given that the first child is "bb." The initial calculations for the probability of the first child being "bb" are confirmed to be correct, leading to a probability of 1/4 for the second child also being "bb." However, confusion arises regarding the sample space and the branching of possibilities after knowing the first child's genotype. Ultimately, it is clarified that the correct probability for the second child remains 1/4, despite initial miscalculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of conditional probability in genetic scenarios.
carnivean1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok I am really stumped and have no clue what I am missing...Here is the scenario. We have a mother and father who can be either $BB$, $Bb$ or $bb$.
The probability for both is:$$P(BB) = P(bb) = \frac{1}{4}$$
$$P(Bb) = \frac{1}{2}$$For the child one gene of the mother and one from the father is randomly chosen.
We want to compute the chance for a child to be $bb$.
Let us denote the parents with:
$$P(mother, father)$$
So the sample space is (- i only posted the part of the sample space that we need, not the whole):
$$P(bb,bb) = (\frac{1}{4})^2=\frac{1}{16}$$
$$P(Bb,bb) = P(bb,Bb) =\frac{1}{4} \frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{8}$$
$$P(Bb,Bb) = (\frac{1}{2})^2=\frac{1}{4}$$
So $P(child = bb) $ is as follows:
$$ P(bb,bb) * 1 + P(Bb,bb) * 0.5 + P(bb,Bb) * 0.5 + P(Bb,Bb) * 0.25$$
$$ = 4 * \frac{1}{16} = \frac {1}{4}$$This part is correct. In the next part we know, that the first child of a family has $bb$ and we have to calculate the chance that the 2nd child has $bb$ as well.My reasoning:
Each path gives us a chance of $\frac{1}{16}$ for the first child being $bb$, so if we know that, we have the following sample space for the parents:
$$(bb,bb), (Bb,bb), (bb,Bb), (Bb, Bb)$$ each is equally likely to be the parent combination.
$$P(bb,bb) = P(Bb,bb) = P(bb,Bb) = P(Bb, Bb) = \frac{1}{4}$$
The chance of the 2nd child being also $bb$ is:
$$ P(bb,bb) * 1 + P(Bb,bb) * 0.5 + P(bb,Bb) * 0.5 + P(Bb,Bb) * 0.25$$
$$ = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}*0.5+ \frac{1}{4}*0.5 + \frac{1}{4}*0.25 = \frac {9}{16}$$But this answer is wrong and I don't know why, could someone please help, I even simulated it and got the exact same result -.-
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi carnivean,

Welcome to MHB! :)

These questions are really confusing and often involve counter intuitive solutions. If you can check your answer then I might try this (although I'm not 100% sure it's correct).

There are 16 combinations (or $2^4$) we can make with $B,B,b,b$. We only care about the ones that start with $bb$ though, since the first child is known to be $bb$. So if we start with four branches for the first child and then branch off from that, how many possibilities do we have? We have two levels basically... 4 branches for the first child and 4 more off each of those. I think the answer should be 1/4 again because only one branch off our original $bb$ branch satisfies the condition.

Sometimes this will be worded like "at least one child is $bb$", in which case we have a different sample space. I would try 1/4 though if you can check your answer. I'm curious if this is correct.
 
The course instructor corrected his answer, my solution is indeed correct...
 
carnivean said:
The course instructor corrected his answer, my solution is indeed correct...

Ok, good to know. I didn't see anything wrong with your logic but was trying to think of it differently. I believe my method doesn't work because it's a second generation problem - we have the parents genes that are unknown who pass them along to kids. I was referring to questions like you see here.

Thank you for the followup!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top