Conditional probability. Unable to prove the general result.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to conditional probability involving an urn containing red and green marbles. Participants explore the probability of selecting a red marble after multiple draws, particularly focusing on proving a general result for the probability expression derived from a specific scenario. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a probability expression for selecting a red marble after n draws and seeks to prove it for all n ≥ 2.
  • Another participant suggests that the probability can be viewed as the expected value of the ratio of red to total marbles after n draws.
  • A later reply indicates that the initial expression holds for n = 1, 2, and 3, and proposes an inductive approach to prove it for all n.
  • Further contributions refine the approach by detailing the probabilities associated with the number of red and green marbles after each draw.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of the law of total expectation in clarifying the steps of the proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to proving the probability expression, but there are nuances in the details of the mathematical reasoning and the application of expectations that remain open to discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express challenges with summation and product indices in their initial attempts, indicating potential limitations in clarity or completeness of their mathematical steps. The discussion does not resolve all uncertainties regarding the proof's generality or the assumptions made.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in probability theory, particularly those exploring conditional probability and mathematical proofs in the context of urn models or similar stochastic processes.

Karlx
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody.
I keep on reading Rohatgi's book "An introduction to Probability and Statistics" and I have worked out the following problem:

"An urn contains r red marbles and g green marbles. A marble is drawn at random and its color noted. Then the marble drawn, together with c > 0 marbles of the same color, are returned to the urn. Suppose that n such draws are made from the urn. Prove that the probability of selecting a red marble at any draw is r/(r+g)."

I have obtained the following expression for the required probability:

<br /> <br /> P(n) = \frac{1}{\prod_{j=0}^{n-1}(r+g+jc)} \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(\stackrel{n-1}{k}) \prod_{j=0}^{k}(r+jc) \prod_{j=0}^{n-k-2}(g+jc)<br /> <br />

This expression gives the result r/(r+g) for values n=2,3.
I have been trying to prove it for all values of n>=2, by induction, but with no success.
Perhaps anyone of you could help me.
Thanks and Happy Halloween !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: P(n) is the expected value of R(n)/(R(n)+G(n)) where R and G are the number of red and green balls after n draws.
 
Thanks bpet.
Calculating P(n) as the expected value of R(n)/(r+g+(n-1)c) I arrive to the same expression I wrote in my first post.

So it remains the problem of proving that

P(n)=r/(r+g) (1)

for all values of n>0.

Finally, I achieved it.
I have proved that expression (1) holds for n=1,2,3.
Then, from the general expression of P(n) I have proved that P(n+1)=P(n).
It's not difficult, but in my first attempt I had some trouble with the indexes of summations and products.

Once again, thanks for your hint.
It has been useful for me in order to look the problem from another point of view.

By the way, I think this problem is known as the Pólya's urn.
The Hungarian mathematician gave it as an example of a martingale, that is, a random variable whose expected value at any time t is equal to his expected
value at a previous time s < t.
 
Last edited:
That's interesting. Also the following identity might be useful:

E[R(n+1)|R(n),G(n)] = R(n)+c*R(n)/(R(n)+G(n))
 
Once again, thanks a lot, bpet.
Your last expression has been, indeed, very useful !
In fact, after "fighting" with summations and products in my first approach to the problem, your expression is the clue to solve it without such a mess.
The new approach follows these steps:

1) Let R(n) and G(n) be respectively the number of red and green marbles at the n-th draw.

2) At the (n+1)th draw,
a) The probability that R(n+1)=R(n) is G(n)/(R(n)+G(n))
b) The probability that R(n+1)=R(n)+c is R(n)/(R(n)+G(n)

So, E[R(n+1)|R(n),G(n)] = R(n)+c*R(n)/(R(n)+G(n)), as you said.

3) And from this last expression,

P(n+1) = E[R(n+1)|R(n),G(n)]/(R(n+1)+G(n+1))
= [R(n)+c*R(n)/(R(n)+G(n))]/(r+g+nc)
= R(n)/(R(n)+G(n)) = P(n)

4) Thus P(n) = r/(r+g) for all n>0.

Thanks for your help !
 
Almost there. The statements in step 3 can be made more precise with the law of total expectation E[X] = E[E[X|Y]].
 
Yes, you are right.

P(n+1) = E[R(n+1)/(R(n+1)+G(n+1))]
=E{E[R(n+1)|R(n),G(n)]}/(R(n+1)+G(n+1))
=E{R(n)+c*R(n)/(R(n)+G(n))}/(r+g+nc)
=E{R(n)/(R(n)+G(n))}= P(n)

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K