Configuration of tables arising from seating of couples

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bingk1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Configuration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the arrangement of C couples across N tables under specific seating rules: couples must not sit at the same table, and if one member of a couple is seated at a table, their partner cannot be seated at any table occupied by another member of a couple. The user seeks to determine if a given seating configuration adheres to these rules. Key findings include that the maximum number of people at any table must be less than or equal to half the total number of people for the first rule to be satisfied, and no table can have N or more people. The solution is linked to the Erdos-Gallai Theorem in graph theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graph theory concepts, particularly the Erdos-Gallai Theorem.
  • Knowledge of combinatorial arrangements and seating configurations.
  • Familiarity with basic mathematical proofs and logical reasoning.
  • Ability to analyze seating arrangements and their implications on graph structures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Erdos-Gallai Theorem and its applications in combinatorial problems.
  • Research graph theory principles related to seating arrangements and bipartite graphs.
  • Explore combinatorial optimization techniques for seating configurations.
  • Investigate related mathematical literature on seating arrangements and graph theory.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, computer scientists, and anyone involved in combinatorial optimization or graph theory, particularly those interested in seating arrangements and their mathematical implications.

Bingk1
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, I need some ideas on this problem, but there's a bit of an explanation before I get to the actual problem.

Say you have C couples to be arranged over N tables. Rules for arrangement are as follows: 1) Couples may not be seated in the same table (i.e. the husband and wife must be separated) and 2) If a couple is already seated at table I and J, then no other couple may be seated at I and J (i.e. if one member of the couple is seated at table I and the partner at table J, then if a member of another couple is seated at table I, that member's partner should not be seated at table J).
If it helps, you may think of the couples as the edges of a graph and tables as vertices. So rule 1 tells us that there are no loops, and rule 2 tells us there aren't any multiple/parallel edges.
I'm not too concerned about the possible arrangements of the couples. I'm more interested in the number of people seated in each table (e.g. If we have 5 tables, four of which have 1 person seated, and the remaining table has 5 people seated, this could be the result of having 4 husbands seated together and their wives each get their own table. Ofcourse, there are other possibilities, but I'm just concerned about the configuration of the tables)

Now, my problem is this. I have N tables, with table i having Ti people seated. What can I do to determine if the seating is a possible arrangement that follows the above rules?

Some things that I have determined:
1) If the table configuration is to satisfy only the first rule, then it is enough that there should be an even number of people and if the table with the most people seated there has P people, then this should be less than or equal to half the total number of people (I'm 99% sure about this, my proof needs work, but I may not get around to it as this is only for the case of the first rule being satisfied).

2)The most that can be seated in one table is N-1 (N is the number of tables). So, if there is a table with N or more people, then the configuration does not satisfy the rules.

Just to be clear, the labeling of the tables is not important either (e.g. It doesn't matter if Table 1 has 1 person, Tables 2 and 3 have two people each, and Table 4 has 3 people, what matters is that there is a table with 1 person, 2 tables with 2 people each, and another table with 4 people). But for convenience, we may label the tables (i.e. Table 1 has the least number of people seated, Table 2 has the next least number of people seated, etc.). Last thing, tables may be empty.

Any help would be much appreciated! Including guiding me to related literature (i.e. if this looks like it fits in a particular area of math that I'm not aware of, or if there are other similar/related problems).

Thanks in advance! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks to all who viewed my post and spent some time on it!

But ... after giving it much thought, I realized that posing the question in terms of graphs might lead to a solution in graph theory, and after some investigation, the solution is the Erdos-Gallai Theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K