Confused about derivatives of the metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the computation of second derivatives of the metric tensor in the context of General Relativity (GR). It clarifies that the second derivative of the metric, represented as g_{cd, ab}, is computed by taking the second derivatives of the components of the metric tensor directly, without the involvement of Christoffel symbols. The Christoffel symbols are relevant only when calculating covariant derivatives, as shown in the expression g_{cd; ab}. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these distinctions for accurate curvature tensor calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric tensors in General Relativity
  • Familiarity with covariant and partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of Christoffel symbols and their role in GR
  • Basic proficiency in tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant derivatives in General Relativity
  • Learn about the computation of curvature tensors using the Riemann curvature tensor
  • Explore the implications of metric compatibility in GR
  • Review examples of second derivatives of various metric tensors
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am incredibly confused about second derivatives of the metric. I know that in general, the covariant derivative of a vector is given by

\nabla_a v^b = \partial_a v^b + \Gamma^b_{ac}v^c

and I think I understand how to generalize to higher rank tensors (just decompose into an outer product of vectors and covectors and use Leibniz, right?).

But, if we have the metric tensor, and we want to take the 2nd derivative

\partial_a \partial_b g_{cd} = g_{cd, ab}

do I just differentiate the components of g twice or are there Christoffel symbols hiding in there too?? They are just partial derivative symbols and not covariant derivatives, so I don't see how/why we'd do anything but differentiate components of the metric.

But I've been trying to compute a curvature tensor for hours now and I cannot for the life of me get the answer that Maple gets, so I must not understand how to compute 2nd derivatives of the metric...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, to calculate
<br /> \partial_a \partial_b g_{cd} = g_{cd, ab} <br />
you simply take the second derivatives of the components of g. The Christoffel symbols only come in when you want to calculate the covariant derivative
<br /> \nabla_a \nabla_b g_{cd} = g_{cd; ab}.<br />
Usually, in GR, we choose the Christoffel symbols such that
<br /> \nabla_a g_{bc} = g_{bc;a} = 0,<br />
the so-called metric compatible connection.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
976
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K