So my book says that to solve a PDE by separation of variables, we check the three cases where λ, the separation constant, is equal to 0, -a^2, and a^2. But in this particular problem, instead of substituting λ=0, λ = a^2, λ= -a^2, they substitute the entire coefficient of X, (λ-1)/k =0, (λ-1)/k =a^2, and (λ-1)/k =-a^2. I've linked a picture of what it says in the solution manual. I don't understand why in this particular problem they substituted the entire coefficient of X rather than just λ.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/2751/91625740.jpg [Broken]

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confused about separation of variables for PDE

Loading...

Similar Threads - Confused separation variables | Date |
---|---|

A Solving a PDE in four variables without separation of variables | Dec 11, 2017 |

I Following an example. Implies L{2du/dt+1}=2s+1. I'm Confused. | Feb 9, 2017 |

I Confused about Finding the Green Function | May 29, 2016 |

Confusion about notation and convention regarding differentials as objects and operators | Jun 9, 2015 |

Sturm-Liouville confusion | Dec 12, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**