- #1

- 267

- 2

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi all,

Whilst reading http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/td1703/thomas.pdf [Broken] I found one of the equations a little difficult to interpret. On page 3, there is a function defined as f. On the denominator there it appears that they have differentiated n(z''(Z')) as a function of z'' and then evaluated it for the case where Z' goes to Zi'.

As far as I can tell, n is only a function of z'' and z'' is not a function of anything else, so the n(z''(Z')) doesn't make much sense to me. I interpretted it as meaning that I write down the expression n(z'') then replace all my z'' s with Z' using an appropriate equation of the form:

Z'=some function of z''.

However, I cannot even write down a clean expression for this! The form of Z', as seen just below eqn 4, cannot be easily rewritten to express z'' as a function of a Z'.

Can anyone help me interpretting this confusing expression?

Thanks!

Whilst reading http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/td1703/thomas.pdf [Broken] I found one of the equations a little difficult to interpret. On page 3, there is a function defined as f. On the denominator there it appears that they have differentiated n(z''(Z')) as a function of z'' and then evaluated it for the case where Z' goes to Zi'.

As far as I can tell, n is only a function of z'' and z'' is not a function of anything else, so the n(z''(Z')) doesn't make much sense to me. I interpretted it as meaning that I write down the expression n(z'') then replace all my z'' s with Z' using an appropriate equation of the form:

Z'=some function of z''.

However, I cannot even write down a clean expression for this! The form of Z', as seen just below eqn 4, cannot be easily rewritten to express z'' as a function of a Z'.

Can anyone help me interpretting this confusing expression?

Thanks!

Last edited by a moderator: