Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Confusion with conversion for the Hubble Constant

  1. Feb 28, 2010 #1
    Hello!

    I want to get my data in terms of h70 -1

    Sometimes the estimates are in terms of h50 or h70, and I know how to convert those just fine.

    However, sometimes they give H0 = 100 h Mpc-1 kms-1 instead.....

    My question is, what is this in terms of h?

    I know that the relation is

    h = H0 / 100 kms-1 Mpc-1

    So, would I be right in thinking that it is as straight forward as h=H0 for this specific case or am I being silly

    Thankyou!! :)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 1, 2010 #2

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    :confused: Absolutely not, because as you yourself have noted, h is actually equal to:

     
  4. Mar 1, 2010 #3
    Hah. I totally figured it out.

    I was confused originally because I did use that equation, but got h=h

    I thought h=70, rather than H0 = 70

    :(

    So is 'h' basically just a fraction then? I understand now.

    Gah. Thanks
     
  5. Mar 2, 2010 #4

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Which is true! But not that informative I guess.

    Right, so that's where your misconception was. That value of H0 corresponds to h = 0.7

    Exactly, you got it now! The parameter h is a dimensionless version of the Hubble constant. It is H0 normalized to a reference value of 100 km s-1 Mpc-1. So h is a fraction...it tells you the ratio of H0 to that reference value.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Confusion with conversion for the Hubble Constant
  1. Hubble's Constant (Replies: 7)

  2. Hubble Constant (Replies: 1)

Loading...