Congressional hearing on UAPs/UFOs

  • Thread starter Thread starter chasrob
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The recent hearing has sparked discussions centered around unsubstantiated claims and hearsay, with participants noting a lack of physical evidence. Despite this, there remains a faction that holds strong beliefs regarding the subject. The conversation reflects a general consensus that the information presented is not new or particularly compelling. The thread is being closed due to the limited scope for further discussion without violating forum rules.
chasrob
Messages
185
Reaction score
58
Any insights on the hearing this week?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, I think this discussion is in the right forum
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, hutchphd and berkeman
BWV said:
well, I think this discussion is in the right forum
A toss-up between here and the general. Figured here would be logical, since there were LGMs involved. :wink:
 
It wasn't last week it was over a month ago. We had some discussion of it here, but I can't seem to find the thread. The general consensus is it's just more of the usual; unsubstantiated claims, hearsay and fuzzy photos/no physical evidence. But there are some who Believe. I'm not sure there's much more to say that would run this afoul of our rules, so I'm going to close it now.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes bob012345, Rive, BillTre and 1 other person
Man, when the Devil comes a-knockin', he does not smell of sulphur and brimstone, he smells of sweet perfume and roses... Doing a bit of research for a short story. All I wanted was some examples of professions typical for jurors in a trial of the time and location of the story (1850s New Orleans - of which I am not very familiar, so I have my work cut out for me). ChatGPT delivered that very nicely, giving me a list of a dozen typical professions for the type of man that was eligible for...

Similar threads

Back
Top