Congressional hearing on UAPs/UFOs

  • Thread starter Thread starter chasrob
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent congressional hearing on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) has been characterized by a lack of substantial evidence, with participants citing unsubstantiated claims and hearsay. The discussion highlighted the presence of Little Green Men (LGMs) as a point of interest, but ultimately concluded that the hearing did not provide any new physical evidence to support the existence of UAPs. The general consensus among forum members is that the hearing reflects ongoing skepticism regarding UAP claims.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UAPs and UFO terminology
  • Familiarity with congressional hearing processes
  • Knowledge of evidence evaluation in scientific discourse
  • Awareness of public perception and media influence on UAP discussions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of UAP hearings on public policy
  • Explore the role of scientific evidence in UAP investigations
  • Investigate historical UAP sightings and their impact on current discussions
  • Learn about the psychological aspects of belief in UAPs and UFOs
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for policymakers, researchers in aerospace and defense, and individuals interested in the sociocultural aspects of UAP phenomena.

chasrob
Gold Member
Messages
185
Reaction score
58
Any insights on the hearing this week?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, I think this discussion is in the right forum
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, hutchphd and berkeman
BWV said:
well, I think this discussion is in the right forum
A toss-up between here and the general. Figured here would be logical, since there were LGMs involved. :wink:
 
It wasn't last week it was over a month ago. We had some discussion of it here, but I can't seem to find the thread. The general consensus is it's just more of the usual; unsubstantiated claims, hearsay and fuzzy photos/no physical evidence. But there are some who Believe. I'm not sure there's much more to say that would run this afoul of our rules, so I'm going to close it now.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: bob012345, Rive, BillTre and 1 other person

Similar threads

Graduate Using the surrounding airflow to deduce the physics around UAP/UFO
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Anyone interested in Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and how they work?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Hearing Woody in Tom Hanks Movies
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
801
High School If the Universe has a cause, what caused that cause?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Man, I hate Bluetooth
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
"Can plants hear?" -- Nobel or IgNobel?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Simple Acoustics Question -- Which neighbor hears the other better?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Engineering Cadre: Engineer, Technologist, Technician, Artisan/Craftsman
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Graduate UAP Report and the Standard Model
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Why does a series of pulses generate a pitch?
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K