I [Congruence class] Proof of modular arithmetic theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equivalence between the congruence classes and modular arithmetic, specifically the statement that [a][x_0] = [c] if and only if ax_0 ≡ c (mod m). Participants clarify that this stems from the definition of congruence classes, where [x] = [y] if x ≡ y (mod m). The proof involves demonstrating that [a][x_0] simplifies to [ax_0]. The justification of this relationship relies on the properties of transitivity and symmetry in congruence. Overall, the explanation successfully convinces participants of the theorem's validity.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
TL;DR Summary
.
157d8fd4ed%2FScreen_Shot_2021-11-22_at_12.31.01_PM.png

Could someone explain why ##[a][x_0]=[c]\iff ax_0\equiv c\, (mod\, m)##?
My instructor said it came from the definition of congruence class. But I am not convinced.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Recall that ##[x] = [y]## if ##x \equiv y \ (\mathrm{mod \ m})##. Then it's just a case of using ##[a][x_0] = [ax_0]##.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and Leo Liu
ergospherical said:
Recall that ##[x] = [y]## if ##x \equiv y \ (\mathrm{mod \ m})##. Then it's just a case of using ##[a][x_0] = [ax_0]##.
Wonderful. I didn't know this form of definition but after seeing its justification (transitivity and symmetry) I am convinced.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top