Conjecture about Dirichlet series.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the conjecture regarding Dirichlet series and their relationship with Ramanujan resummation. It proposes that for a Dirichlet series converging for Re(s) > a, a regularized sum can be expressed as the difference between the series and a term involving constants C, a, and b. The speaker suggests that this formulation holds true even when the coefficients a_n are all equal to 1, leading to a known result. Furthermore, they assert that the tail integral characteristic of Ramanujan resummation should always conform to this structure, raising the question of whether this can be universally demonstrated. The inquiry emphasizes the need for proof regarding the integral's evaluation in the proposed form.
mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
Hi, i hope it is not a crack theory

i had the idea when reading Ramanujan resummation, i believe that for a Dirichlet series which converges for Re (s) > a , with a a positive real number then we can obtain a regularized sum of the divergent series in the form:

\sum_{n >1}a_{n}n^{-s}- C(s-a)^{b}

with C, a and b real numbers , in case a_n are all 1 we recover the result

\sum_{n >1}n^{-s}- (s-1)^{-1}

however i believe that 'Ramanujan resummation of series' given by

\sum_{n >1}a_{n}n^{-s}-\int_{1}^{\infty}a(x)x^{-s}

must be satisfied no matter what kind of numerical series is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're saying that the tail integral which is characteristic of Ramanujan resummation can be put in the form c(s-a)^b always for a, b, c constants. However can it be shown that the integral will evaluate in the given form always?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K