Conjugate momentum in the hamiltonian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of conjugate momentum in the context of the Hamiltonian, particularly in a magnetic field. The term for the Hamiltonian is given as H=\frac{1}{2m}(p-qA)^2. It is established that p is the conjugate momentum, while p_c=p-qA represents the mechanical momentum. Additionally, the canonical momentum operator is confirmed to be -i\hbar\nabla, distinguishing it from classical momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with canonical and mechanical momentum concepts
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields in classical physics
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian in electromagnetic fields
  • Learn about the implications of canonical momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between classical and quantum momentum operators
  • Investigate the role of gauge fields in Hamiltonian mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in Hamiltonian dynamics and electromagnetic theory.

moobox
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I just have a quick question that I haven't quite been able to find a definitive answer to, regarding conjugate momenta in the Hamiltonian.

Ok, so it regards the following term for the hamiltonian in a magnetic field:

H=\frac{1}{2m}(p-qA)^2

I'd like to ask whether p is the conjugate momentum or if p_c=p-qA is the conjugate momentum. As a guess, I would say that p_c=p-qA is the conjugate momentum, as it seems to me that the hamiltonian should take into account the magnetic field. Would this then mean that the hamiltonian could be written as H=\frac{1}{2m}(p_c)^2

Also, very important, does -i\hbar\nabla represent the canonical momentum operator or the classical/mechanical momentum operatpor?

Im sure the answers are around somewhere on the internet, but it strikes me that there are some conflicting statements and a tendency to just go "oh yeah, now we swap the canonical momentum, p for mechanical momentum p" and the like, so it would be nice to get a definitive answer.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p is the conjugate/canonical momentum. p-eA is the mechanical momentum.
 
Ah, brilliant! Thanks for your quick response!

So that would make i\hbar\nabla the conjugate/canonical momentum operator?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K