Conjugate variables in the Fourier and Legendre transforms

  • #1
285
13
In quantum mechanics, position ##\textbf{r}## and momentum ##\textbf{p}## are conjugate variables given their relationship via the Fourier transform. In transforming via the Legendre transform between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, where ##f^*(\textbf{x}^*)=\sup[\langle \textbf{x}, \textbf{x}^*\rangle - f(\textbf{x}) ]##, ##\textbf{x}## and ##\textbf{x}^*## are Legendre conjugates. Furthermore, ##\textbf{x}^*## is often described as the slope of the tangent line at ##f(\textbf{x})##.

In physics, the conjugate relationship between ##\textbf{r}## and ##\textbf{p}## is considered equivalent to the conjugate relationship ##\textbf{x}## and ##\textbf{x}^*## such that for the Legendre transform between the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian ##\textbf{r}## and ##\textbf{p}## are used in place of ##\textbf{x}## and ##\textbf{x}^*##. To me at least, this equivalence is not at all obvious.

What is the mathematical basis for this substitution?

In other words, are both the following true for the same variables, and if so, under what conditions?
##\mathscr{F}[g(\textbf{r})]=G(\textbf{p})##
And
##f^*(\textbf{r})=\sup[\langle \textbf{r}, \textbf{p}\rangle - f(\textbf{p}) ]##
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Please ignore the post. I see a mistake.
 

Suggested for: Conjugate variables in the Fourier and Legendre transforms

Replies
4
Views
342
Replies
7
Views
533
Replies
7
Views
600
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
237
Replies
6
Views
714
Replies
22
Views
908
Back
Top