Connection between subspace, span, and basis?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between subspaces, spans, and bases in vector spaces. To verify that a subset is a subspace, one must demonstrate that it satisfies the necessary properties of a vector space, such as containing the zero vector and being closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Linear independence is not required to confirm that a subset spans a subspace; rather, a set can span a space without being linearly independent. Additionally, a set of vectors can span a vector space without being a basis if it contains dependent vectors. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the concepts of vector spaces and their properties.
hakujin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on a relation issue if there is a direct relation at all.

If I were to verify that a subset is a subspace of a vector space V, would it then be correct to check that subset for linear independence to verify that the subset spans the subspace? I'm not sure if I'm following the material quiet correctly.

I completely understand that if the set is linearly independent it is a basis for V and that if S spans V it is a basis, but I'm unsure of the process connection to any verification of a subspace.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hakujin said:
If I were to verify that a subset is a subspace of a vector space V, would it then be correct to check that subset for linear independence to verify that the subset spans the subspace?
As you stated the problem, that would not be necessary. You have a set defined and I assume it is a subset of the vector space. Now you need to show that the set has the properties of a space. Most properties will be inherited from the original vector space and you can just say which properties are inherited (associative, commutative, etc.). Then you need to show that the subset has all the vectors it needs to be a subspace ( 0 in the subset, rV, V1+V2 in the subset for every r∈R and V1, V2 in the subset.)
 
Last edited:
the vectors (0,1) and (1,0) form a basis for the plane, and any set that contains these vectors spans the plane. The plane is a subspace.

In 3 space, the subset (1,1,2) and (1, 2,2) is a basis for a plane in R^3, while not every subset containing these vectors spans exactly that plane, any subset consisting of those vectors and sums of scalar multiples of them does so. E.g. the subset (1,1,2), (1,2,2) and their sum (2,3,4) spans that same plane.
 
Last edited:
hakujin said:
If I were to verify that a subset is a subspace of a vector space V, would it then be correct to check that subset for linear independence to verify that the subset spans the subspace?
"The x axis" ##\{(x,0)|x\in\mathbb R\}## is a subspace of "the x-y plane" ##\mathbb R^2##, but it's not a linearly independent set.

hakujin said:
I completely understand that if the set is linearly independent it is a basis for V and that if S spans V it is a basis, but I'm unsure of the process connection to any verification of a subspace.
##\{(1,0,0),(0,1,0)\}## is a linearly independent subset of ##\mathbb R^3##, but it doesn't span ##\mathbb R^3##, so it can't be a basis for ##\mathbb R^3##.

##\{x\in\mathbb R^3:|x|<1\}## spans ##\mathbb R^3##, but isn't linearly independent, so it can't be a basis for ##\mathbb R^3##.
 
Last edited:
(0, 1, 0), (1, 0, 0), and (0, 2, 0) span a subspace of R3, specifically the subspace of all vectors of the form (x, y, 0) for any numbers x and y. But the three vectors are NOT independent so do not form a basis. Either {(0, 1, 0), (1, 0, 0)} or {(0, 2, 0),(1, 0, 0)} is a basis for that two dimensional subspace.
 
hakujin said:
I'm stuck on a relation issue if there is a direct relation at all.

It seems perhaps your issue is with the definitions. Then span of a set of n vectors, written as span(\{ v_1, v_2, \dotsm , v_n \}) is the set of all possible linear combinations of those n vectors. A basis is a collection of linearly independent vectors whose span is a vector space.

If I were to verify that a subset is a subspace of a vector space V, would it then be correct to check that subset for linear independence to verify that the subset spans the subspace? I'm not sure if I'm following the material quiet correctly.

To verify that a subset of V is also a subspace of V, you would need to show that the subset itself satisfies the properties of a vector space (contains 0, closed under vector addition, associative under vector addition, etc. -- there are about 10 of these properties that must be satisfied).

I completely understand that if the set is linearly independent it is a basis for V and that if S spans V it is a basis, but I'm unsure of the process connection to any verification of a subspace.

Do you? If a set S of vectors spans V, S is not necessarily a basis. As an example,

span(\{ [1,0], [0,1], [2,3] \}) = \mathbb{R}^2

but clearly { [1,0], [0,1], [2,3] } is not linearly independent. However, note that

span(\{ [1,0], [0,1] \}) = \mathbb{R}^2

also, and { [1,0], [0,1] } is a basis (the difference here is that this set is linearly independent). Also, a set of vectors (in V) that is linearly independent is not necessarily a basis of V. For example, S=\{ [1,0,0], [0,1,0]\} is a set of linearly independent vectors in \mathbb{R}^3 but S does not form a basis for \mathbb{R}^3 -- in fact, span(S) is a basis for a subspace that is isomorphic to \mathbb{R}^2. We need the size of the basis set to be equal to the dimension of the vector space!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K