Connes' non-commutative geometry: useful or just an exercise?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Geometry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the utility of Connes' non-commutative geometry in physics, questioning whether it has practical applications beyond mathematical methods. Participants explore the relevance of this theory to physical theories and seek references to support their inquiries.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the practical usefulness of Connes' non-commutative geometry in physics, questioning if any physical theory would be negatively impacted if it had never been published.
  • Another participant provides a link to Wikipedia, highlighting sections that mention applications of non-commutative geometry in particle physics, including its speculated role in M-theory.
  • A later reply indicates that the provided reference was helpful in addressing the initial question about the theory's utility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the usefulness of Connes' non-commutative geometry in physics, with some expressing doubt and others pointing to potential applications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the topic and reliance on external references for clarification. There is an acknowledgment of the need for more accessible resources on the subject.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of mathematics and physics, particularly those exploring advanced theoretical frameworks and their applications in physical theories.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
I know about the construction of the algebra in which operators as in Hilbert spaces are developed from Connes' non-commutative geometry, but I don't find any references [besides further publications by Connes himself] which say that this has turned out to be useful in physics for more than a study of some of the mathematical methods involved. In other words, would any theory of physics be worse off if Connes had never published? If so, could someone tell me what, and if possible, some references freely available on the Internet? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Thanks very much, jedishrfu! (I don't know how I overlooked that...o:).) I have downloaded the referenced paper. That answers the question.
 
Yay! So many times I seem to miss the mark. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K