Consequences of time not being continuous

  • Thread starter Thread starter YoshiMoshi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
YoshiMoshi
Messages
233
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



Given that the phenomena of time is non continuous, despite it often being considered as being so, what are the consequences of this? It seems that the foundation of mathematics that describes the physical world assumes that time is continuous, which we believe now to be false. I know that the difference between continuous and non continuous is very small for time, but even a little bit off has major consequences. Doing something like integration or differentiation becomes very difficult.

Or say for example analog to digital converters convert a continuous system to a discrete one, but what is actually going on is that we are converting an already discrete system to a discrete system with a higher sample time.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
YoshiMoshi said:

Homework Statement



Given that the phenomena of time is non continuous, despite it often being considered as being so, what are the consequences of this? It seems that the foundation of mathematics that describes the physical world assumes that time is continuous, which we believe now to be false. I know that the difference between continuous and non continuous is very small for time, but even a little bit off has major consequences. Doing something like integration or differentiation becomes very difficult.
The mathematical definitions of integration and differentiation are not changed. They do not depend on how the math is being applied to any particular physical situation. The truth is that the physics at that quantum level is handled with entirely different mathematics anyway.
Or say for example analog to digital converters convert a continuous system to a discrete one, but what is actually going on is that we are converting an already discrete system to a discrete system with a higher sample time.
I'm not sure what you mean here. The sample time of any analog to digital converter is much too great to require any quantum-time considerations.

PS. Is this really a homework problem? It didn't look like it so I replied here as though it is not. If it really is homework, you should show your ideas and work and we are only allowed to ask leading questionss and give hints.
 
YoshiMoshi said:

Homework Statement



Given that the phenomena of time is non continuous, despite it often being considered as being so, what are the consequences of this? It seems that the foundation of mathematics that describes the physical world assumes that time is continuous, which we believe now to be false. I know that the difference between continuous and non continuous is very small for time, but even a little bit off has major consequences. Doing something like integration or differentiation becomes very difficult.

None of this is true. I think you have picked up some wrong ideas from somewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
It does seem to be a rather bold statement to say "we know" that time is non-continuous. Can you define what group of physicists you mean by "we?" Of course we need to be very careful in physics about using the term "we know."

Are you perhaps thinking about some speculations that the universe is a type of computer simulation, i.e. "digital physics?" Zuse wrote the seminal paper on this decades ago, called "Calculating Space." Although fascinating as a speculation, I think it's fair to say it's not a mainstream area of physics research at this time.

In any case, here is a previous discussion from PF on a question that seems related to your question.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-time-continuous.3396/