1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Conservation of angular momentum

  1. Jun 5, 2012 #1
    Everyone knows how an ice-skater can increase her speed by pulling her arms in. Doing so the moment of inertia decreases, and thus her angular velocity MUST increase due to the conservation of angular momentum. But work is also done in the process. My question is:
    Say the ice skater pulls in her arms and spins faster. If she then pulls the out again: Will she spin slower again? I think so yes, because angular momentum is conserved. I am however unable to see how she would do negative work on herself (which she MUST to lose the extra kinetic energy gained from pulling in her arms).
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 5, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    hi zezima1! :smile:
    she does negative work on her arms

    if her arms were on strings, they would naturally fly out to the full extent of the strings

    to pull them in, she needs to do work … the tension is in the same direction as the displacement

    to let them out again, she just lets the strings out … so the work done is negative … the tension is in the opposite direction to the displacement :wink:
     
  4. Jun 5, 2012 #3

    pcm

    User Avatar

    but since her angular velocity is changing there should be a torque .and obviously the torque of tension is zero wrt the axis.
     
  5. Jun 5, 2012 #4

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    no, you only need a torque to change angular momentum :wink:

    (and it doesn't change)
     
  6. Jun 5, 2012 #5

    pcm

    User Avatar

    oops...
    sorry for that,feeling sleepy..
     
  7. Jun 5, 2012 #6

    pcm

    User Avatar

    but still we need a tangential force to change angular velocity.
    how can only a radial force change angular velocity.
     
  8. Jun 5, 2012 #7

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    still sleepy! :zzz:

    force only changes momentum (or angular momentum) :wink:
     
  9. Jun 5, 2012 #8
    Hi tim, thanks for the answer. I'm still finding it a bit hard to swallow though. In the case, where she pulls in her arms she does a positive work on them. This extra energy must come from chemical energy in her cells. In the case where she pulls out her arms, where does the energy go? Certainly it doesn't go back into the cells!
     
  10. Jun 5, 2012 #9

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    she can store it in springs, if she wants to

    if she doesn't, it's like where does the energy go when she walks downstairs …

    if she falls downstairs, it goes into kinetic energy, but if she controls her speed, her cells have to use up energy to do so

    that's the way the body works, it's very wasteful even when it's doing no work
     
  11. Jun 5, 2012 #10

    pcm

    User Avatar

    the problem rephrased:
    no net external torque ,implies L is conserved.
    she does work in pulling her arms,implies KE changes.
    but now consider her inner body(excluding arms hands) as our system,
    now since in the whole process moment of inertia of inner body does not change and angular velocity increases, there is an increase in angular momentum of her inner body.
    but the force from outside the system is that from her arms (and also normal force,weight etc.) and the torque of that is zero.so what torque produces change in L of her inner body.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2012
  12. Jun 5, 2012 #11

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    oooh, that's interesting … i've never seen that mentioned before!

    yes, in addition to the radial force needed to pull the arms in, which does work, and which everyone mentions

    there's a tangential force needed, which of course does no work (because it's perpendicular to the displacement), and so no-one ever bothers to mention it! :rolleyes:

    this force provides a torque which reduces the angular momentum of the arms,

    and the equal and opposite reaction torque increases the angular momentum of the inner body :smile:

    well spotted!
     
  13. Jun 5, 2012 #12

    pcm

    User Avatar

    so what is that tangential force?
    i can not find one.
     
  14. Jun 5, 2012 #13

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    when she pulls her arms in,

    she also has to pull them back slightly, to reduce their angular momentum :wink:
     
  15. Jun 6, 2012 #14

    pcm

    User Avatar

    thanks tiny-tim for your replies.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook