Conservation of Energy and Angular Speed.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the conservation of energy principle to determine the speed of two blocks and the angular speed of a pulley in a system starting from rest. The user calculated the gravitational potential energy converted to kinetic energy, resulting in a block speed of 3.96 m/s. The moment of inertia for the pulley was calculated as 0.04 kg*m², and the angular speed was derived using the relationship ω = v / R, yielding an angular speed of 19.8 rad/s. The methodology and calculations were confirmed as correct by other participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations for disks
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy equations
  • Basic concepts of rotational motion and angular speed
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the conservation of energy equation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of pulleys and their applications in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational motion, including torque and angular momentum
  • Investigate real-world applications of energy conservation in engineering systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to enhance their understanding of energy conservation and rotational dynamics in practical scenarios.

astro2525
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the conservation of energy law to find the speed of the blocks and the angular speed of the pulley when the heavier block hits the ground. The system starts at rest. (going to include picture)
http://i.imgur.com/CjB3gzK.jpg


Homework Equations


Moment of inertia for a disk (I believe): I = (1/2)mR^2
KE = (1/2)m*v^2
KE of pulley = (1/2)I(v/R)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


R = radius .2 m
m1 = 10 kg rock
m2 = 4 kg rock
mp = mass of pulley

Tried reading some things out of my textbook but that didn't help much =(. Decided to let the PE of each block at it's initial position be 0, so the amount of GPE that is converted to KE is:
KE = (10 kg - 4 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(2 m) = 117.6 J

calculate moment of inertia:
I = (1/2)mpR^2 = (1/2)*2*.2^2 = .04 kg*m^2

then the KE of the system:

K = (1/2)(m1 + m2)v^2 + (1/2)I(v/R)^2

K = v^2(1/2)[10 kg + 4 kg + (.04 kg*m^2 / (0.20 m)^2)] = v^2(7.5 kg)

Set v^2(7.5) equal to the available energy that was converted from PE and solve for v:

v = √(117.6 J / 7.5 kg) = 3.96 m/s

Is this stuff even right? I basically just derived it from my textbook and am having a hard time completely understanding it. Really not sure how I would get angular speed .. would it just be ω = v / R?

Rereading this gives me a headache so if anyone helps, I commend you! ;D
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The key for the angular speed is seeing that the speed of the blocks has to equal the speed of a point on the pulley's surface as it rotates, seeing as the rope doesn't slip.
 
BeBattey said:
The key for the angular speed is seeing that the speed of the blocks has to equal the speed of a point on the pulley's surface as it rotates, seeing as the rope doesn't slip.

care to elaborate? lol, not sure how I would go about doing that
 
You've already found the velocity of the block. The velocity of the block must equal the velocity of a point on the pulley's surface. Using that, apply the equation that relates translational speed to rotational speed.
 
BeBattey said:
You've already found the velocity of the block. The velocity of the block must equal the velocity of a point on the pulley's surface. Using that, apply the equation that relates translational speed to rotational speed.

so it is ω = v / R ?
ω = 3.96 m/s / .20 m = 19.8 rad/s?

Btw, do you happen to know if all the other stuff is right?
 
I didn't analyze your work equation by equation but the method did seem correct. And yep, your method to find the angular velocity is correct :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
BeBattey said:
I didn't analyze your work equation by equation but the method did seem correct. And yep, your method to find the angular velocity is correct :)

Sweet, thanks a lot =D
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K