Conservation of energy of ball in a half pipe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of energy for a ball released in a half-pipe scenario, where the left side is rough and the right side is frictionless. The conclusion is that the ball will rise to a height lower than its initial height h on the right side due to energy being allocated to rotational kinetic energy as the ball rolls without slipping. This indicates that not all potential energy converts to translational kinetic energy, as some is used for the ball's rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE)
  • Familiarity with the concept of rolling motion and rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of the law of conservation of energy
  • Basic principles of friction and its effects on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational kinetic energy and its calculation
  • Learn about the dynamics of rolling motion without slipping
  • Explore energy conservation in systems with multiple forms of energy
  • Investigate the effects of friction on motion in various physical scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding energy conservation in dynamic systems.

rasputin66
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A ball is released on the inside surface of a half-pipe. The left side of the pipe is rough, so that the ball rolls there without slipping. The right side of the pipe is coated with frictionless ice. If the ball is released from a height h on the left side, how high will it go on the right side? Neglect air resistance.

A. h
B. Higher than h
C. Lower than h
D. There is no way to answer without knowing the mass of the ball.

I see the answer is C, but I don't understand why. Doesn't the law of conservation turn PE into enough KE to get back up to h? Why not?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The law of conservation of energy does mean any change in potential energy will generally become a kinetic energy, but this problem is dealing with more than one type of kinetic energy. The key is the wording "the ball rolls there without slipping". What this means is that the ball rotates. Some of the potential energy goes into the ball moving in the normal way down the hill like problems you probably did in a previous part of the course. By implying a finite sized ball that has the ability to rotate, you're adding a new way for that potential energy to be spent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
945
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K