A ball climbing a ramp while "rolling the wrong way"

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of a ball rolling down a ramp and subsequently climbing a frictionless slope. The ball, initially at height h, reaches a maximum height of h' = 5/7 h on the blue slope due to energy conservation principles. However, the claim from the Italian "Physics, 11th edition" by Cutnell and Johnson that the ball returns to its original height is incorrect, as it fails to account for the direction of rotation and energy dissipation due to friction. The participants agree that the problem is poorly framed and likely too complex for the intended audience of high school students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with rotational and translational kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of friction's role in motion dynamics
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of energy conservation in non-conservative systems
  • Study the effects of friction on rolling motion and energy dissipation
  • Explore angular momentum conservation in complex motion scenarios
  • Investigate the dynamics of objects rolling on curved surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of motion dynamics, particularly in scenarios involving rolling objects and energy conservation.

  • #31
haruspex said:
You can get around that with calculus.
##\Delta L=I\Delta\omega=r\int F.dt##
##\Delta p=m\Delta v=\int F.dt##.
Eliminate ##\int F.dt##.

Sure, I know. But 17 yr old students won't know integrals for a couple of years or so. I meant harder for them.

On second thoughts, they do have the concept of average. So for them we say: even if friction changes along the way, by definition its overall effect can be described through an average friction
##\Delta L=I\Delta\omega=r \bar F \Delta t##
##\Delta p=m\Delta v=\bar F \Delta t##.
Eliminate ##\bar F \Delta t##

This is actually what I was referring to when I mentioned "average friction force and torque" a few posts back [post-6492781].

haruspex said:
It would be very rare to worry about acceleration being discontinuous.

Well, at the end of the frictionless surface the discontinuity is perhaps to be expected. But I find the other one, when the ball starts rolling, kind of intriguing.
For some reason I expect the speed to vary smoothly between v_0 and v_1.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
FranzDiCoccio said:
Well, at the end of the frictionless surface the discontinuity is perhaps to be expected. But I find the other one, when the ball starts rolling, kind of intriguing.
For some reason I expect the speed to vary smoothly between #v_0# and #v_1#.
How about a sliding object coming to a stop? That's usually taken as a sudden transition from a constant-ish nonzero acceleration to a zero one. Of course, one could allow that no object is perfectly rigid, so it doesn’t all stop at once, etc., ultimately getting down to oscillations of interacting dipoles. But does the standard simplification keep you awake at night?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FranzDiCoccio
  • #33
Ok, I see... The point is that acceleration is caused by kinetic friction, which vanishes as soon as the object stops.

But it works even if the object does not stop, e.g. because the horizontal plane it is sliding on has a "rough patch" of finite length, that is not sufficient to stop it.

Here too the speed decreases linearly, but won't vanish.

Something similar happens with the sliding ball, although it's a bit more subtle.
When the object attains the "rolling without slipping" speed, the kinetic friction vanishes even though the surface has no discontinuity.
The relevant friction is static, which does not produce work, and hence it does not slow down the object further.Cool. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
23K