Conservation of Momentum and Relative Velocities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum and relative velocities. An 82-kg lumberjack moves at 2.7 m/s relative to a 380-kg log, which is initially at rest. The correct calculation for the lumberjack's speed relative to the shore is determined using the equation m1v1' + m2v2' = 0, leading to a final speed of 2.1 m/s. The confusion arises from the interpretation of relative velocities, particularly how the lumberjack's speed relative to the log affects the overall calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with relative velocity concepts
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of conservation of momentum in closed systems
  • Study relative velocity calculations in physics
  • Practice problems involving multiple objects in motion
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in physics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and momentum, as well as educators looking for examples of relative velocity problems.

henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 82-kg lumberjack stands at one end of a 380-kg floating log, as shown in the figure (Figure 1) . Both the log and the lumberjack are at rest initially.

If the lumberjack now trots toward the other end of the log with a speed of 2.7 m/s relative to the log, what is the lumberjack's speed relative to the shore? Ignore friction between the log and the water.

Express your answer using two significant figures.

Homework Equations


Conservation of Momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


m1v1' + m2v2' = 0
m1v1' = -m2v2'
(82)(2.7) = (-380)(v2')
v2' = -0.5826

velocity in respect to shore = 2.7 + (-0.5826) = 2.1 m/s
For some reason this answer is incorrect. I also tried 2.7 + 0.5826 = 3.3 m/s, but that is wrong also. Is there something that I am doing incorrectly before this last step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the 2.7 m/s is w.r.t the log, right ? But the 0.58 m/s can not be wrt the log. !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K