Conservation of Momentum; finding the angular speed of a Neutron star

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed of a neutron star using the conservation of momentum. The initial radius of the star is 6.0×105 km, and the final radius after collapse is 16 km. The initial angular velocity was incorrectly calculated as 0.000002 rad/s due to insufficient significant figures. The correct angular speed, after recalculating with proper precision, is determined to be approximately 3098.95 rad/s using the formula L = Iω and the moment of inertia I = (2/5)MR2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its units
  • Ability to perform unit conversions, particularly for angular measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the properties and formation of neutron stars
  • Study the derivation and applications of the moment of inertia formula
  • Explore angular momentum conservation in astrophysical contexts
  • Investigate the significance of significant figures in scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying astrophysics, physics educators, and anyone interested in the dynamics of stellar collapse and angular momentum conservation.

Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Under some circumstances, a star can collapse into an extremely dense object made mostly of neutrons and called a neutron star. The density of a neutron star is roughly 10^{14} times as great as that of ordinary solid matter. Suppose we represent the star as a uniform, solid, rigid sphere, both before and after the collapse. The star's initial radius was 6.0×10^5km (comparable to our sun); its final radius is 16km

If the original star rotated once in 33 days, find the angular speed of the neutron star.
Express your answer using two significant figures and in rad/s

Ri = initial radius
Rf = final radius

Homework Equations


Conservation of Momentum

I = 2/5MR^2

L = Iw

The Attempt at a Solution



I first converted the 1 rev/ 33 days to rad/s

1/33 rev/ day *(2pi)*(1 day/24 hours)*(1hour/60 min)*(1 min/60 sec)
w = 0.000002 rad/s

I = (2/5)*(M)*(Ri^2)*(0.000002) = (2/5)*(M)*(Rf^2)wf

The masses (M) and the 2/5 cancel

3.6x1017 = 2.56x108*wf

wf = 1.40625x109

It says it's wrong. The only thing that I can think of that is wrong is that I did the angular velocity (w) conversion wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Northbysouth said:
I first converted the 1 rev/ 33 days to rad/s

1/33 rev/ day *(2pi)*(1 day/24 hours)*(1hour/60 min)*(1 min/60 sec)
w = 0.000002 rad/s

Hello,
Note that you've only kept 1 significant figure in w. How many sig figs should you have? Also, you might want to use scientific notation for this very small number.

I = (2/5)*(M)*(Ri^2)*(0.000002) = (2/5)*(M)*(Rf^2)wf

I'm sure you meant to type L rather than I at the beginning of the equation.

The masses (M) and the 2/5 cancel

3.6x1017 = 2.56x108*wf

Did you forget to multiply by wi on the left side?
 
I think you're right. So I get:
(6x10^8)^2 * 0.000002 = (16000)^2 * wf

wf = 2812.5 rad/s

But my answer is still wrong
 
Look's like your method is correct. But I really do think you should include more significant figures in your expression for wi. The number .000002 has only one significant figure. The problem gives data with two significant figures. What do you get for wi expressed to two significant figures? How does this affect your final answer?
 
You are correct. I ran the calculation again using the exact value my calculator gave me. wf = 3098.95.

My calculator is a TI-89 and I was used the approximate function to get the answer, which gave me 0.000002. The real value for wi is pi/1425600.
Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K