Conservation of momentum (wrecking ball hits a stationary object)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a wrecking ball with a mass of 0.5 kg traveling at 3.03 m/s colliding with a stationary block weighing 0.06 kg. The poster calculated the exit velocity of the ball and the final velocity of the block, but found the momentum equation unbalanced, leading to confusion about conservation of momentum. Responses clarified that momentum is not conserved in the entire scenario due to gravitational potential energy being released, and that momentum conservation applies only during the collision itself. The poster ultimately acknowledged their misunderstanding and expressed gratitude for the assistance received. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying conservation laws in physics problems involving multiple forces and energy transformations.
SMOKEYWC
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I am struggling with a conservation of momentum problem, that I can't get right. If anyone can help, I would greatly appreciate it. Please note I am a 52-year-old student who is not very good at math.
Relevant Equations
m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
I have a wrecking ball with a mass of .5kg traveling at 3.03 m/s that hits a stationary block .9 meters high, weighing .06kg. I calculated the ball's exit velocity after it hits the block to be -3.00 m/s .

I calculated the final velocity of th block to be 4.2 m/s
Vf = Sqrt 2(g)(h) = sqrt 2(9.8)(.9) = sqrt 17.64 = 4.2

Looking at conservation of momentum where m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

(.5)(3.03) + (.06)(.0) = (.5)(3.0) + (.06)(4.2)

1.51 = 1.5 + .252 (1.77)

the equation is not balanced, so I don't conservation of momentum. What am I doing wrong?
Again any help would be greatly appreciated.4

Thank you
Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! It's not clear what you are doing. Can you draw a sketch of the situation? Is this a 1D problem, a 2D problem, is gravity involved?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
Hi Bob

Thank you for replying so quickly.. Here is a picture (below) of what I am talking about I am trying to calculate the amount of energy converted from one form to another.

The mass of the ball swinging down is .5kg, its velocity is 3.03 m/s . The mass of the block the ball is colliding with is .06kg with a height of .90 m.

I know PE = KE

The potential energy of the swinging ball is is (m)(g)(dh) or (.5)(9.8)(.47) = 2.30 joules
The kinectic energy is the same 1/2 mv^2 or 1/2(.5)(3.03)^2 = 2.30 joules

But my question is conservation of momentum for the collision b/t the ball and the block

I assume this is an inelastic collision

to determine the momentum in the system

m1 = mass of ball m2 =mass of block

The final velocity of the block falling I found by √2(g)(h) or √2(9.8)(.9) = 4.2 m/s

m1vi + m2vi = m1vf + m2vf, the force of momentum should be the same, but when I work out the equation, the forces are unbalanced.

.5(3.03) + .06(0) = .05(3.00) + .06(4.2)

1.51 kg m/s does not equal 1.5 + .252 = 1.77 m/s

sorry for confining people, I am confused myself Michael
1664573447209.png
 
SMOKEYWC said:
Hi Bob

Thank you for replying so quickly.. Here is a picture (below) of what I am talking about I am trying to calculate the amount of energy converted from one form to another.

The mass of the ball swinging down is .5kg, its velocity is 3.03 m/s . The mass of the block the ball is colliding with is .06kg with a height of .90 m.

I know PE = KE

The potential energy of the swinging ball is is (m)(g)(dh) or (.5)(9.8)(.47) = 2.30 joules
The kinectic energy is the same 1/2 mv^2 or 1/2(.5)(3.03)^2 = 2.30 joules

But my question is conservation of momentum for the collision b/t the ball and the block

I assume this is an inelastic collision

to determine the momentum in the system

m1 = mass of ball m2 =mass of block

The final velocity of the block falling I found by √2(g)(h) or √2(9.8)(.9) = 4.2 m/s

m1vi + m2vi = m1vf + m2vf, the force of momentum should be the same, but when I work out the equation, the forces are unbalanced.

.5(3.03) + .06(0) = .05(3.00) + .06(4.2)

1.51 kg m/s does not equal 1.5 + .252 = 1.77 m/s

sorry for confining people, I am confused myselfMichael
I can't make much sense of what you are doing. Momentum is not conserved for this whole scenario, as both objects are releasing PE. Momentum is conserved for the collision, which would equate the momentum of the ball immediately before the collison with the sum of the momentum of the ball and block immediately after the collision.

Because gravity is involved, the momentum of the system from start to finish is not conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and SMOKEYWC
PeroK said:
I can't make much sense of what you are doing. Momentum is not conserved for this whole scenario, as both objects are releasing PE. Momentum is conserved for the collision, which would equate the momentum of the ball immediately before the collison with the sum of the momentum of the ball and block immediately after the collision.

Because gravity is involved, the momentum of the system from start to finish is not conserved.
thank you so much, you helped clarify things a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
SMOKEYWC said:
I have a wrecking ball with a mass of .5kg traveling at 3.03 m/s that hits a stationary block .9 meters high, weighing .06kg. I calculated the ball's exit velocity after it hits the block to be -3.00 m/s .
It looks like your calculation says that the ball bounces back with pretty much the speed it had before the collision. This would be the case if the ball collided with an immovable wall without energy loss. Obviously your calculation went astray. Perhaps if you told us what question you wish to answer given this situation, we could be of more help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
SMOKEYWC said:
I calculated the final velocity of th block to be 4.2 m/s
Vf = Sqrt 2(g)(h) = sqrt 2(9.8)(.9) = sqrt 17.64 = 4.2
The value you calculated would be the speed of an object that fell 0.9 m starting from rest. It doesn't really apply to the problem at hand.

It would help immensely if you could provide us the original problem statement.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and SammyS
Also note, momentum is a vector quantity which means direction matters, you cannot mix vertical and horizontal motion as the momentum is separately conserved in the x and y directions when it is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and PeroK
SMOKEYWC said:
Homework Statement:: I am struggling with a conservation of momentum problem, that I can't get right. If anyone can help, I would greatly appreciate it. Please note I am a 52-year-old student who is not very good at math.
What you have written does not qualify as a homework statement.

You have confused us more than the physics is confusing you!
 
  • Sad
Likes bob012345 and PeroK
  • #10
Mister T said:
What you have written does not qualify as a homework statement.

You have confused us more than the physics is confusing you!
I disagree with this criticism. We should never blame or shame the poster for asking questions and trying to learn especially when they just joined PF.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark, PeroK, haruspex and 3 others
  • #11
I thank everyone who has replied. My question was regarding the Rube Goldberg simulation I am required to make for my PHY 101 class. I should have provided much greater detail to my original query. I was extremely frustrated after spending an embarrassingly long time trying to find the errors in my project, and my question was asked through this frustration. Again I apologize for the confusion. I was able to go back and find my mistake and ultimately was able to answer my question.

Again thank you to everyone.
Michael
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345 and topsquark

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top