Consumption of a galaxy by its central black hole

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Televisionary
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Galaxy Hole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centers of galaxies, specifically addressing their consumption of surrounding matter. It is established that SMBHs do not continuously consume material; rather, they only interact with nearby stars through orbital dynamics. There is no size limit for black holes, which can grow indefinitely by consuming dark matter, but not dark energy, as dark energy does not contribute to mass or gravity. The presence of a black hole does not destabilize the surrounding galactic system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supermassive black holes (SMBHs)
  • Familiarity with orbital dynamics and interactions
  • Knowledge of dark matter and dark energy concepts
  • Basic grasp of Hawking radiation theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the dynamics of supermassive black holes in galactic centers
  • Explore the role of dark matter in black hole growth
  • Study the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole lifespan
  • Investigate the effects of black holes on galactic stability
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of galaxies and the role of black holes in cosmic evolution.

Televisionary
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about the supermassive black hole that is theorized to be at the center of our galaxy, and indeed, at the center of most galaxies. If that black hole is continuously consuming the stars, planets and gas around it, given enough time, will it not consume the entire galaxy that orbits it? Or is there a size limit for black holes? Do they just keep adding mass as long as there is matter and energy to consume? Does this include dark matter and dark energy? Are they affected by black holes like ordinary matter?

I have more, but the next questions depend on the answers to these. Thanks for any help.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It was my own very limited understanding that the mass in a galaxy will eventually fall into the black hole in the centre. Just over an incredibly large timescale. THen these black hole will eventually evaporate due to Hawking radiation, leaving a universe full of leptons.
 
Supermassive black holes do not continuously suck up material. For example, the SMBH in the center of our galaxy currently has nothing to suck up. Orbital interactions between the nearby stars may swing one near enough to be torn apart, but this doesn't happen that often. (Depending on what time scale you're talking about)

Put simply, black holes, of any type, are not like vacuum cleaners. If the Sun were suddenly replaced by an equal mass black hole, nothing would happen to the Earth or any of the other planets. (Other than suddenly losing all of our light, obviously) Our orbits would remain exactly the same.

Or is there a size limit for black holes? Do they just keep adding mass as long as there is matter and energy to consume? Does this include dark matter and dark energy? Are they affected by black holes like ordinary matter?

There is no size limit. They grow to any size. It would include dark matter, but not dark energy. Dark energy is not "energy" in the usual sense, and does not add to mass or gravity.
 
Last edited:
Ah...well, that answers that. I think the piece I was missing is that the presence of a black hole in any system doesn't necessarily destabilize that system. Thank you all for helping me understand this better. I think I get it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K