Continuous Lensing Models: Discrete Data

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing discrete data in the context of gravitational lensing, specifically referencing Schneider, Kochanek, and Wambsganss's work on azimuthally averaged mass profiles. The formula for tangential shear, $$\langle \gamma_t \rangle = \bar \kappa - \langle \kappa \rangle$$, is central to the analysis. The user seeks methods to quantify error in their analysis of a Singular Isothermal Sphere using 10,000 spatially distributed shear values. The response highlights the use of simple averages and error-weighted averages, as well as the recommendation to explore maximum likelihood methods for more complex scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational lensing concepts and terminology
  • Familiarity with azimuthal averaging techniques
  • Knowledge of error analysis in statistical methods
  • Basic proficiency in maximum likelihood estimation methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research error-weighted averages and their application in data analysis
  • Learn about maximum likelihood methods for estimating continuous models from discrete data
  • Study the principles of gravitational lensing as outlined in "Gravitational Lensing: Strong Weak and Micro"
  • Explore techniques for quantifying errors in spatially distributed datasets
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in astrophysics, data analysts working with discrete datasets, and anyone involved in gravitational lensing studies will benefit from this discussion.

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hello,

I am not sure if this question is better suited to the mathematics section, but I thought it would be easier to explain the problem here.

In Schneider, Kochanek and Wambsganss's "Gravitational Lensing: Strong Weak and Micro" pages 279-280, they derive a relation for determining the azimuthally averaged mass profile of a lens, from a measurement of the tangential shear averaged over concentric circles.

$$\langle \gamma_t \rangle = \bar \kappa - \langle \kappa \rangle$$

where ##\bar \kappa## is the disc average of the convergence and ##\langle \kappa \rangle## is the ring average of the convergence.

I have some simulated data for a Singular Isothermal Sphere that I am trying to analyse. The data consists of 10,000 spatially distributed points, each with shear values.

Evidently, when I compute a ring average with my data, I am actually averaging a discrete number of data points over an annulus, not a continuous field over a ring. I'm not sure how to approach quantifying the error in this method, or adapting the analysis for discrete data. Are there standard methods to approach this kind of problem? I essentially have a discretely sampled dataset of a continuous field, but I don't think I can assume all the same relations will apply to my data as they do the fields.

I hope that my question makes sense, and if I need to provide any more information to make things clearer i'd be happy to do so.

Many thanks!
 
Space news on Phys.org
As it looks like you're just taking simple averages, if the data points all have the same error ##\sigma_d##, then the error on the average is simple:

$$\sigma_{\langle d \rangle} = {\sigma_d \over \sqrt{N}}$$

If the data points don't have the same errors, then you can do an error-weighted average:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean#Dealing_with_variance

Note that for doing this kind of thing in general, you may want to learn about maximum likelihood methods. These are the preferred techniques for more complicated examples where we want to use discrete data points to estimate a continuous model. This particular model seems simple enough that you can just use error-weighted averages, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K