Contractions of indices of the 4-vectors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nikol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4-vectors Indices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the contractions of indices in 4-vectors, specifically addressing the equations involving partial derivatives and their validity as tensor equations. The equations presented are confirmed as numerically correct: \(\partial^{\mu}x_{\mu}=4\), \(\partial^{\mu}x^{\mu}=2\), \(\partial^{\mu}x_{\nu}= \delta^{\mu}_{\nu}\), and \(\partial^{\mu}x^{\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}\). However, it is established that \(\partial^{\mu}x^{\mu}=2\) is not a valid tensor equation due to the presence of two raised indices, which violates the requirement for Lorentz invariance in tensor equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-vector notation and indices
  • Familiarity with tensor equations and their properties
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance in physics
  • Basic grasp of differential operators in the context of tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensors in the context of general relativity
  • Learn about the implications of Lorentz invariance on physical equations
  • Explore the mathematical framework of differential geometry
  • Investigate the role of indices in tensor calculus and their contraction rules
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students studying general relativity or advanced calculus, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of tensor analysis and Lorentz invariance.

nikol
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone confirm those or did I not get the meaning of the 4-vectors indices:

\partial^{\mu}x_{\mu}=4;\partial^{\mu}x^{\mu}=2;\partial^{\mu}x_{\nu}= \delta ^{\mu}_{\nu};\partial^{\mu}x^{\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are all numerically correct, however the second one is not a valid tensor equation, because you have two raised \mu indices. Correct tensor equations always have contractions between one upper and one lower index--if you don't do that, the resulting equation is not Lorentz-invariant.
 
Thank you for the clarification
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K