Contrapositive Proof of Positive x & y: x^n<y^n implies x<y

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical statement regarding positive numbers x and y, specifically focusing on the implications of the inequalities x < y and x^n < y^n. The original poster seeks to understand the contrapositive approach for the converse of the statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to prove the contrapositive of the statement, questioning how to approach the proof and what it entails. There are inquiries about the relevance of certain conditions and the nature of the assumptions involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the contrapositive and the assumptions that must remain constant. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the inequalities and the methods of proof, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the theorem applies specifically to positive numbers, and discussions include the importance of this condition in the context of the proof. There are references to mathematical identities related to polynomial factoring that may aid in the proof process.

garyljc
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1st part , using induction to prvoe that if both x and y are positive then x<y implies x^n<y^n
2nd part, prove the converse, that if both x and y are positive then x^n<y^n implies x<y

Homework Equations


my question is more on the second part. I understand that I have to use the indirect proof using contrapositive.


The Attempt at a Solution


I started with this
If x and y are not positive then it does not imply the following x^n<y^n implies x<y
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garyljc said:

Homework Statement


1st part , using induction to prvoe that if both x and y are positive then x<y implies x^n<y^n
2nd part, prove the converse, that if both x and y are positive then x^n<y^n implies x<y

Homework Equations


my question is more on the second part. I understand that I have to use the indirect proof using contrapositive.


The Attempt at a Solution


I started with this
If x and y are not positive then it does not imply the following x^n<y^n implies x<y
First, what you have written here is irrelevant. The theorem (and therefore its contrapositive) talks only about positive numbers. "x and y both positive" is not part of the hypothesis, it is a "preliminary requirement" What is true if x and y are not positive does not matter. The theorem itself is simply "x^n< y^n implies x< y".

Are you clear on what the contrapositive is here? The contrapositive requires that the hypothesis and conclusion be negated and reversed. "x and y both positive" is not part of the hypothesis, it is a "preliminary requirement" that stays the same.

If x and y are positive numbers, then [itex]x^n\ge y^n[/itex] implies [itex]x\ge y[/itex].

Also, while you can prove it using induction, you don't have to. [itex]x^n<br /> \ge y^n[/itex] implies that [itex]x^n- y^n\ge 0[/itex] and [itex]x^n- y^n= (x- y)(x^{n-1}+ x^{n-2}y+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ xy^{n-2}+ y^{n-2}[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i do understand contrapositive
but I'm new to it
does it mean that I'm suppose to prove if x^n < y^n is false therefore it implies that x < y is false ?
am i heading the correct direction ?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Also, while you can prove it using induction, you don't have to. [itex]x^n<br /> ge y^n[/itex] implies that [itex]x^n- y^n> 0[/itex] and [itex]x^n- y^n= (x- y)(x^{n-1}+ x^{n-2}y+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ xy^{n-2}+ y^{n-2}[/itex]

i do not understand how did you arrive at this conclusion
 
garyljc said:
i do understand contrapositive
but I'm new to it
does it mean that I'm suppose to prove if x^n < y^n is false therefore it implies that x < y is false ?
am i heading the correct direction ?
Yes, you are. Don't forget that you are assuming also that x and y are positive and that "x^n< y^n is false" is the same as "[itex]x^n\ge y^n[/itex]".

garyljc said:
i do not understand how did you arrive at this conclusion
What conclusion do you mean? If you are talking about the factoring (which is not a "conclusion"), what do you get if you multiply (x- y) and (xn-1+ yxn-2+ ...+ xyn-2+ yn-1? And what would it say if n= 2?
 
What conclusion do you mean? If you are talking about the factoring (which is not a "conclusion"), what do you get if you multiply (x- y) and (xn-1+ yxn-2+ ...+ xyn-2+ yn-1? And what would it say if n= 2?[/QUOTE]


sorry i meant like who did you factor that up ?
is there a formula to help me with ?
 
Did you kow that x2- y2= (x- y)(x+ y)? How about x3- y3= (x- y)(x2+ xy+ y2)?

Yes, there is a formula: it is exactly what I gave: xn- yn= (x- y)(xn-1+ xn-2y+ ...+ xyn-2+ yn-1. And, again, you can prove that by multiply the right hand side.
 
Thanks . Got it =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K