Convergence of Sequence x_n = (1/2)(x_n + 2/x_n)

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter linuxux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergent Series
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 6K views
linuxux
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a question i can figure out.

THE QUESTION:

Show that

[tex]\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{2\sqrt{2}}, \sqrt{2\sqrt{2\sqrt{2}}}, ...[/tex]

converges and find the limit.From what I see, the first term is root 2, the second term will be the root of 2 times the first term making it larger than the first term, the third term will be the root of 2 times the second term making it larger than the second term.

How can this converge to a real number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A formal proof would involve showing that the sequence [tex]x_n= \sqrt{2x_{n-1}} , x_1= \sqrt{2}[/tex] is strictly increasing and is bounded by a certain value, but really that's boring isn't it?

Heres a less rigorous but more fun way :)

Lets take some terms in the sequence and solve for 2 (Not that hard, just square both sides and divide both sides by 2 until the RHS is prepared :) :

[tex]x_1^2 = 2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{ x_2^4}{4} = 2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{ x_3^8}{64} = 2[/tex]

Ooo i Think i see a pattern :) Write the Denominators on the LHS as a power of 2, and take them over to the RHS :)

[tex]x_3^8 = 2^7[/tex]

We can see in general :
[tex]x_n^{2^n} = 2^{2^n -1}[/tex]

So using this for the 5th term,
[tex]x_5^{32} = 2^{31}[/tex], which I've checked is true.

Now, Take the log base 2 of the general form and use the following log rule, where b can be any base: [itex]\log_b y^k = k \log_b y[/itex].

So we have: [tex]2^n \log_2 x_n = 2^n -1[/tex], dividing both sides by [itex]2^n[/tex] and then making both sides the exponents of 2 finally gives us:<br /> <br /> [tex]x_n = 2^{ \frac{2^n -1}{2^n}}[/tex].<br /> <br /> So now, take the limit as n approaches infinity, the exponent on the RHS becomes 1. ie<br /> [tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} x_n = 2[/tex].<br /> <br /> Very nice?[/itex]
 
Gib Z said:
A formal proof would involve showing that the sequence [tex]x_n= \sqrt{2x_{n-1}} , x_1= \sqrt{2}[/tex] is strictly increasing and is bounded by a certain value, but really that's boring isn't it?

Heres a less rigorous but more fun way :)

Lets take some terms in the sequence and solve for 2 (Not that hard, just square both sides and divide both sides by 2 until the RHS is prepared :) :

[tex]x_1^2 = 2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{ x_2^4}{4} = 2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{ x_3^8}{64} = 2[/tex]

Ooo i Think i see a pattern :) Write the Denominators on the LHS as a power of 2, and take them over to the RHS :)

[tex]x_3^8 = 2^7[/tex]

We can see in general :
[tex]x_n^{2^n} = 2^{2^n -1}[/tex]

So using this for the 5th term,
[tex]x_5^{32} = 2^{31}[/tex], which I've checked is true.

Now, Take the log base 2 of the general form and use the following log rule, where b can be any base: [itex]\log_b y^k = k \log_b y[/itex].

So we have: [tex]2^n \log_2 x_n = 2^n -1[/tex], dividing both sides by [itex]2^n[/tex] and then making both sides the exponents of 2 finally gives us:<br /> <br /> [tex]x_n = 2^{ \frac{2^n -1}{2^n}}[/tex].<br /> <br /> So now, take the limit as n approaches infinity, the exponent on the RHS becomes 1. ie<br /> [tex]\lim_{n\to \infty} x_n = 2[/tex].<br /> <br /> Very nice?[/itex]
[itex] <br /> <br /> Sir, thank you.[/itex]
 
No, thank YOU, I think that's the first time I've ever been called sir :D
 
The monotone convergence theorem is the formal proof I mentioned you could do in my original post, Wikipedia states: If a_k is a monotone sequence of real numbers (e.g., if a_k ≤ a_{k+1},) then this sequence has a limit (if we admit plus and minus infinity as possible limits.) The limit is finite if and only if the sequence is bounded. I don't know why or how they could implement summation into it. Please post the proofs if the book included them.

Edit: It seems you deleted your last post, making me look like a crackpot talking to myself lol
 
Last edited:
Gib Z said:
Please post the proofs if the book included them.
No, no proof. the previous ones i did all utilized summation and that was the only technique they showed, but I'll tinker with it until tomorrow if i can't get it I'll surely post.
Gib Z said:
Edit: It seems you deleted your last post, making me look like a crackpot talking to myself lol

Just trying to keep you on your toes.

;)
 
Last edited:
Another Question

I have another question for you.

I have a sequence defined by:

[tex]x_1=2[/tex]

[tex]x_{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}(x_n + \frac{2}{x_n})[/tex]

and i have to show that

[tex]x^2_n[/tex]

is always greater than 2.The only thing i can come up is this; I end up using two cases (its convoluted, its confusing, i don't even know if it qualifies as a proof, i don't know if its the best proof if it is a proof, but anyway) :

i have to show that:

[tex]x^2_n > 2[/tex] which is equivalent to [tex]x_n > \sqrt{2}[/tex]we assume

[tex]x_n > \sqrt{2}[/tex].

we know

2 > [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].the expression

[tex]x_n + 2[/tex]

has two numbers > [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].when we add 2 to [tex]x_n[/tex] the result will either be a number twice as great as [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] or not.case 1:
suppose adding 2 to [tex]x_n[/tex] does produce a number twice as great as [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].

we know

[tex]x^2_n > x_n > \sqrt{2}[/tex]

so

[tex]\frac{x^2_n}{x_n} > \sqrt{2}[/tex].

but if

[tex]\frac{x^2_n}{2x_n} < \sqrt{2}[/tex]

then

[tex]\frac{x^2_n + 2}{2x_n} > \sqrt{2}[/tex]case 2:
suppose adding 2 to [tex]x_n[/tex] does not produce a number twice as great as [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].

then we know [tex]x^2_n[/tex] is a number at least 4 times greater than [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].

so

[tex]\frac{x^2_n}{2x_n}[/tex] is still greater than [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex].does that work as a proof?

(by the way, I've still only been given Monotone Convergence and Cauchy Condensation to use to prove.)
 
Last edited: