Dragonfall
- 1,023
- 5
Does there exist a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive reals?
The discussion centers on the existence of a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive real numbers. It is established that if a sum of positive real terms converges to a finite value, the index set must be countable, specifically referencing the ordinal notation where \(\epsilon_0\) is the first uncountable ordinal and \(\omega_1\) denotes the least uncountable ordinal. The participants clarify definitions of sums and emphasize that a proper definition for uncountable sums is lacking, with the Riemann integral being the closest established concept. A hint for proving the assertion involves the countable dense set within the real line.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and researchers interested in set theory and the foundations of analysis will benefit from this discussion.
First you will have to define what you mean by "uncountable sum"! I know a definition for finite sums and I know a definition for countable sums (the limit of the partial, finite, sums), but I do not know any definition for an uncountable sum except, possibly the integral that bpet suggested.Dragonfall said:Does there exist a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive reals?
g_edgar said:Definition Let S be an index set. Let a \colon S \to \mathbb{R} be a real function on S. Let V be a real number. Then we say V = \sum_{s\in S} a(s) iff for every \epsilon > 0 there is a finite set A_\epsilon \subseteq S such that for all finite sets A , if A_\epsilon \subseteq A \subseteq S we have \left|V - \sum_{s \in A} a(s)\right| < \epsilon .
Dragonfall said:So does there exist sequences x_i indexed by ordinals D\geq\epsilon_0 such that \sum_{i\in D}x_i is finite, and that each x_i is positive?
Dragonfall said:Yes I was mistaken on the notation, it should be \omega_1.
You have yet to say why. You asserting it true doesn't constitute a proof.