Converging Uncountable Sum of Positive Reals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive real numbers. It is established that if a sum of positive real terms converges to a finite value, the index set must be countable, specifically referencing the ordinal notation where \(\epsilon_0\) is the first uncountable ordinal and \(\omega_1\) denotes the least uncountable ordinal. The participants clarify definitions of sums and emphasize that a proper definition for uncountable sums is lacking, with the Riemann integral being the closest established concept. A hint for proving the assertion involves the countable dense set within the real line.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with ordinal numbers, specifically \(\epsilon_0\) and \(\omega_1\)
  • Knowledge of convergence criteria for series of real numbers
  • Basic concepts of set theory and index sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Riemann integrals and their limitations in defining uncountable sums
  • Study the implications of ordinal numbers in set theory, focusing on \(\epsilon_0\) and \(\omega_1\)
  • Explore convergence criteria for series, particularly in relation to positive real numbers
  • Investigate the concept of dense sets in the real line and their role in convergence proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and researchers interested in set theory and the foundations of analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Does there exist a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive reals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would that be an integral?
 
No. I mean an actual uncountable sum. An (Riemann) integral is the limit of a sequence of countable sums.
 
In the sensible way to define uncountable sums, you prove that for a sum of real terms, if it converges (to a real number) then all but countably many terms must be zero.
 
Dragonfall said:
Does there exist a converging uncountable sum of strictly positive reals?
First you will have to define what you mean by "uncountable sum"! I know a definition for finite sums and I know a definition for countable sums (the limit of the partial, finite, sums), but I do not know any definition for an uncountable sum except, possibly the integral that bpet suggested.
 
Definition Let S be an index set. Let a \colon S \to \mathbb{R} be a real function on S. Let V be a real number. Then we say V = \sum_{s\in S} a(s) iff for every \epsilon > 0 there is a finite set A_\epsilon \subseteq S such that for all finite sets A , if A_\epsilon \subseteq A \subseteq S we have \left|V - \sum_{s \in A} a(s)\right| < \epsilon .
 
I'm surprised. I thought this would have been defined at some point.

Suppose x_i is a (possibly uncountable) sequence of positive reals indexed by some ordinal L. Then their sum is \sum_{i\in L}x_i=\sup\{\sum_{i\in k}x_i:k<L\}. This takes care of limit ordinals.

So does there exist sequences x_i indexed by ordinals D\geq\epsilon_0 such that \sum_{i\in D}x_i is finite, and that each x_i is positive?
 
g_edgar said:
Definition Let S be an index set. Let a \colon S \to \mathbb{R} be a real function on S. Let V be a real number. Then we say V = \sum_{s\in S} a(s) iff for every \epsilon > 0 there is a finite set A_\epsilon \subseteq S such that for all finite sets A , if A_\epsilon \subseteq A \subseteq S we have \left|V - \sum_{s \in A} a(s)\right| < \epsilon .

I don't know what this definition is trying to achieve. I prefer mine.
 
Dragonfall said:
So does there exist sequences x_i indexed by ordinals D\geq\epsilon_0 such that \sum_{i\in D}x_i is finite, and that each x_i is positive?

If and only if D is countable.
 
  • #10
Well \epsilon_0 is the first uncountable ordinal, so why not?
 
  • #11
Strange ... \epsilon_0 is commonly used to represent a certain countable ordinal, while \omega_1 denotes the least uncountable ordinal. In any case, that notation doesn't matter. Here is a repeat of the same answer as before: If a sum of positive real terms converges to a finite value, then the index set is countable.
 
  • #12
Yes I was mistaken on the notation, it should be \omega_1.

You have yet to say why. You asserting it true doesn't constitute a proof.
 
  • #13
Dragonfall said:
Yes I was mistaken on the notation, it should be \omega_1.

You have yet to say why. You asserting it true doesn't constitute a proof.

Hint for the proof: the real line has a countable dense set, and every term of the convergent series corresponds to an interval.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K