Conversion of millicuries to Kilograys (?)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt Doherty
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of Millicuries (mCi) to Kilograys (Gy) in the context of radiation measurement and absorbed dose. Direct conversion is not possible without knowing the specific radioisotope and its decay characteristics, as the energy absorbed depends on the type of radiation emitted (alpha, beta, gamma) and the decay rate. The Society of Nuclear Medicine's Committee on Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) provides methodologies for calculating absorbed doses, which can be applied to similar scenarios involving microorganisms in saline solutions. Accurate dose calculations require Monte Carlo methods and consideration of radiation absorption dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Millicuries and Becquerels in radiation measurement
  • Knowledge of radioisotope decay rates and energy emissions
  • Familiarity with the inverse square law and radiation absorption principles
  • Experience with Monte Carlo simulation methods for radiation interaction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific decay characteristics of various radioisotopes
  • Learn about the Society of Nuclear Medicine's MIRD methodologies
  • Explore Monte Carlo simulation software for radiation dose calculations
  • Investigate the effects of different types of radiation on microorganisms in solutions
USEFUL FOR

Radiation physicists, medical physicists, microbiologists, and professionals involved in radiological safety and dosimetry will benefit from this discussion.

Matt Doherty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there any conversion between Millicuries (radiation measurement) and Kilograys (absorbed energy)? In other words if there was a radiaition source of 3000 millicuries what would be the equivalent in Kilograys absorbed dose be if a microorganism organism in a saline solution absorbed if a liquid sample of that radiation source were added to the solution. Not sure if this is a conversion that can be done, but wanted to ask anyway. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not directly, you need to know the specific radioisotope, as well as the activity (disintegrations per second). The curie, ( the current recommended unit is the Becquerel), is a measurement of the rate at which a radioactive material decays ( one Bq is one disintegration per second). The energy released and therefore the energy absorbed depends on the decay products for each disintegration as well as the number of disintegration and the type of radiation emitted, gamma, beta, or alpha.

3.7 x 107 Bq = 1 mCi.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and hutchphd
One would need the decay rate multiplied by the energy per decay (the product proportional to dose rate) and integrated over time to get energy deposited. Of course, one would have to determine how much of the energy of the decay is absorbed locally, as opposed to radiation the escapes from the body of interest.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: gleem, berkeman and hutchphd
Astronuc said:
One would need the decay rate multiplied by the energy per decay (the product proportional to dose rate) and integrated over time to get energy deposited. Of course, one would have to determine how much of the energy of the decay is absorbed locally, as opposed to radiation the escapes from the body of interest
This could be a big problem depending on the isotope and the size of the container used for the culture.

I might also add that since the radiation is emitted from a myriad of point sources and since the absorption of radiation is nonuniformly absorbed as it recedes (inverse square law and various absorption processes) one must average the absorption over the path. The Society of Nuclear Medicine's Committee on Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) had developed methods for calculating the absorbed dose of administered radiopharmaceuticals to human organs which would be similar to the OP situation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc
gleem said:
This could be a big problem depending on the isotope and the size of the container used for the culture.
The OP describes a complicated situation with a microbe, or population of microbes, in a solution. OP
a microorganism organism in a saline solution absorbed if a liquid sample of that radiation source were added to the solution.

A saline solution could contain radioisotopes of Na, Cl or both, or Cs, and other cation or anion. Usually, an external does is applied, which could be electrons or photons (X-ray or gamma), or a mix. We have software for determining the interaction of radiation (electrons and photons) with matter, including solids and liquids. One would usually benchmark an application with distributed dosimeters in order to check the calculated/predicted dose against measured dose.

One would normally use a Monte Carlo (MC) method with a discretized volume. Sources close to surfaces would have some fraction of radiation escape, while sources further in, would have more of their emanations absorbed in the material.
 
Last edited:
@Matt Doherty

What is the purpose of putting a radioisotope into the solution of microorganisms?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K