Converting Acceleration to Velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between acceleration and velocity, particularly questioning whether velocity can be expressed as the square root of acceleration. The context includes a specific scenario involving an object with a given mass and force, seeking to determine the time taken to travel a certain distance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of acceleration and velocity, questioning the original poster's assumption about their relationship. Some suggest reviewing basic kinematics and finding expressions that relate distance, time, and acceleration. Others provide resources for further learning.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on kinematic equations and suggesting resources for better understanding. There is no explicit consensus on the original question, but several interpretations and approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the lack of a physics textbook for the original poster, indicating that the relevant concepts may not be covered in their current curriculum.

Thrawn
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is velocity equivalent to the square root of accelleration?


Homework Equations


V = d/t


The Attempt at a Solution



A = accelleration, expressed in meters per second squared

V = distance (m) divided by time (s)

So V = sqrt A ?



In the context of the question: How long does it take an object with a mass of 100g (.1kg) mass to travel 10 cm (.1m), with a force (assumed to be constant) of 0.0000000132944 N.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thrawn said:
Is velocity equivalent to the square root of accelleration?
Uh... no.

A = accelleration, expressed in meters per second squared

V = distance (m) divided by time (s)

So V = sqrt A ?
If velocity were the square root of acceleration, it would have units of square root of distance divided by time.

In the context of the question: How long does it take an object with a mass of 100g (.1kg) mass to travel 10 cm (.1m), with a force (assumed to be constant) of 0.0000000132944 N.
Time for you to review basic kinematics. Find an expression that relates distance with time for a given acceleration.
 
Precisely, acceleration is the derivative of velocity, expressed in m/s per second. Its the rate of change of velocity, or V/t. That means V = At

Your question relates distance (not velocity) to acceleration, in which case you need to find the constant acceleration and then plug it into the kinematic equation D = vo + .5at^2
 
If possible, could someone direct me to a website which provides an introduction (prefferably oriented towards beginners with very little prior knowledge of the subject or complementary subjects) to the kinematics involved in this equation?
 
Don't you have a textbook that defines acceleration?
 
This site isn't bad: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/1DKin/U1L6a.html"

And check out our own tutorial section: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=95426"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Don't you have a textbook that defines acceleration?

I wish I had a textbook for this... but alas, it is not covered in the Ontario Grade 8 curriculum, as such a physics textbook would be rather unneccessary, as it is not taught...
 
Doc Al said:
This site isn't bad: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/1DKin/U1L6a.html"

And check out our own tutorial section: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=95426"


Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Having found the appropriate kinematic equation, I have calculated the following:

d = Vi*t + 0.5*a*t^2

= 0m/s*t + 0.5*a*t^2

= a*t^2/2

2d= a*t^2

2(0.1m)/a = t^2

0.2/0.000000132944m/s^2 = t^2

sqrt 1 504 392.827055000617 = t

t = 1 226.5369244 s

Is the value for t, one thousand two hundred twenty - six seconds correct, and was the equation used correctly?
 
  • #10
That looks fine. A few comments:

Express numbers such as the force using exponential notation (like 1.32944 × 10^-8 N); they are much easier to read that way instead of a string of zeroes.

Take care with significant figures. It looks like your values for mass and distance only have one significant figure--yet your answer has around 20. Not very realistic! (Just because the calculator carries all those digits doesn't mean you should keep them in your answer.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K