Converting centrifugal acceleration to frequency

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting centrifugal acceleration to frequency using the formulae a=ω²R and f=ω/2π. The correct derivation shows that if the centripetal acceleration (a) is 10G (100 m/s²) and the radius (R) is 1m, the angular velocity (ω) is calculated as 10 rad/s, leading to a frequency (f) of approximately 1.59 Hz. Participants emphasize the importance of using correct significant figures and units, specifically noting that frequency should be expressed in "Hz" rather than "hz".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and its relationship to frequency
  • Familiarity with centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Ability to manipulate and solve equations involving physical constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular velocity and its applications in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific reporting
  • Explore the relationship between centripetal acceleration and frequency in different contexts
  • Investigate the implications of ambiguous problem statements in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics who are working with rotational motion and frequency calculations.

NODARman
Messages
57
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I've calculated this. Is it correct?

a=ω²R => ω=√(a/R)
T(period)=1/ω=1 / (√(a/R))
f = 1/T = √(a/R)
[ if a=10G=100 m/s² ; R=1m ]
then: f = √(a/R) = √(100/1) = 10 hertz

In angular velocity, can I just convert a=ω²R to ω=√(a/R) and write instead of ω=(2π)/T (in the first line)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a mistake in line 2. ##T = \dfrac{2 \pi}{\omega}##. In line 3 you are also saying that T = 1/f (this is correct), which means you are saying that ##\omega = f##, which is not true. The definition is ##\omega = 2 \pi f##.

As to the rest, clearly you are doing more than deriving an expression for frequency. Please post the whole problem statement.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and NODARman
topsquark said:
You have a mistake in line 2. ##T = \dfrac{2 \pi}{\omega}##. In line 3 you are also saying that T = 1/f (this is correct), which means you are saying that ##\omega = f##, which is not true. The definition is ##\omega = 2 \pi f##.

As to the rest, clearly you are doing more than deriving an expression for frequency. Please post the whole problem statement.

-Dan
Is this now correct?

a=ω²R => ω=√(a/R)
ω=2πf => f = ω/2π

if a=10G=100 m/s² ; R=1m

then:
ω = √(a/R) = 10 rad/s
f = ω/2π = 10/2π = 5/π = 1.59154943 hz
 
NODARman said:
Is this now correct?

a=ω²R => ω=√(a/R)
ω=2πf => f = ω/2π

if a=10G=100 m/s² ; R=1m

then:
ω = √(a/R) = 10 rad/s
f = ω/2π = 10/2π = 5/π = 1.59154943 hz
Yes and no.
Yes: Your derived equation is correct. I have no idea where you got your numbers so I can't verify if you are putting them in right. Again, please post the whole problem.

No: The number you calculated for f is correct. But if you are going to be using g = 10 m/s^2 then your answer shouldn't be given to anywhere near that number of significant digits. Technically your answer should only be to one sigfig but you could probably get away with two. No more.

No: The unit for frequency is written as "Hz" not "hz."

Otherwise, good work.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
If you take ##g## = 10 m/s2, there is no point in specifying your answer to ten digits ...

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
topsquark said:
Yes and no.
Yes: Your derived equation is correct. I have no idea where you got your numbers so I can't verify if you are putting them in right. Again, please post the whole problem.

No: The number you calculated for f is correct. But if you are going to be using g = 10 m/s^2 then your answer shouldn't be given to anywhere near that number of significant digits. Technically your answer should only be to one sigfig but you could probably get away with two. No more.

No: The unit for frequency is written as "Hz" not "hz."

Otherwise, good work.

-Dan
So, here's the problem:

1661951579625.png


R = 1-meter block of wood rotating in space. Calculate the frequency of rotation, if the centripetal acceleration on the edge of the block is equal to 10Gs or ~100 m/s^2
 
NODARman said:
So, here's the problem:

View attachment 313551

R = 1-meter block of wood rotating in space. Calculate the frequency of rotation, if the centripetal acceleration on the edge of the block is equal to 10Gs or ~100 m/s^2
Yep, it looks good, then. Along with the comments made above, that is.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NODARman
NODARman said:
R = 1-meter block of wood rotating in space. Calculate the frequency of rotation, if the centripetal acceleration on the edge of the block is equal to 10Gs or ~100 m/s^2

Is this a 1-meter block that rotates about its middle? If so, the radius of rotation is 0.5 m. The statement "R = 1-meter block" is ambiguous.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
topsquark said:
Yep, it looks good, then. Along with the comments made above, that is.

-Dan
Thanks for helping.
 
  • #10
kuruman said:
Is this a 1-meter block that rotates about its middle? If so, the radius of rotation is 0.5 m. The statement "R = 1-meter block" is ambiguous.
Well, I meant radius.
 
  • #11
NODARman said:
Well, I meant radius.
OK, then.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NODARman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K