Converting from lb_f/in to N/m issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on converting units from lb_f/in to N/m for calculating the damping ratio in a physics problem. The user has converted the spring constant, mass, and damping coefficient but questions the validity of their results, particularly the unusually high damping ratio of 1000.26. They express confusion over the definition of natural frequency (ω_n) and acknowledge a mistake in their calculations regarding the mass and spring constant relationship. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit conversions and understanding the underlying equations in dynamics. Clarifying these aspects is essential for obtaining correct results in mechanical systems.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I am trying to find a damping ratio. I know ##k=50## lb##_f##/in, ##m=50## lb, ##c = 0.75## lb##_f##-sec/in.

Homework Equations


##1## lb##_f##/in = ##175.1268## N/m
##1## lb = ##0.4536## kg

The Attempt at a Solution


Then ##k = 8756.34## N/m, ##c = 131.345## N/m-sec, and ##m = 22.675## kg.
$$
\zeta = \frac{c}{2\omega_nm} = \frac{131.345}{2(0.00259)(22.675)} = 1000.26
$$
but this seems awfully large. Are my conversion factors incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is ##\omega_n## defined?
 
vela said:
How is ##\omega_n## defined?

Thanks. I divided m by k instead of the other way around.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
22K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K