Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the considerations for converting kinetic energy to electrical energy, focusing on the necessary steps for an individual without engineering expertise to pursue this idea. Participants explore the roles of engineers and patent attorneys in the process of developing and protecting an invention.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests that the individual should contact an engineer to calculate energy production and determine the appropriate turbine and generator sizes.
- Another participant proposes that a patent attorney should be contacted first for legal and confidentiality matters before moving on to engineering considerations.
- Some participants argue that a patent attorney may not perform the necessary upfront work and recommend finding a consultant with a secrecy clause in their contract.
- There is a discussion about the costs associated with setting up a new invention, with one participant noting that legal fees may vary based on the attorney's experience and the complexity of the invention.
- Another participant emphasizes that having a physical prototype is crucial for patent credit, not just the idea itself.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the order of contacting professionals, with some advocating for starting with a patent attorney while others emphasize the need for engineering consultation first. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention the importance of confidentiality and the need for a well-defined contract when engaging with consultants. There is also uncertainty regarding the costs involved in the patenting process and the development of the invention.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in inventing, patenting processes, and those seeking guidance on the engineering aspects of energy conversion technologies.