Correct statement about error and uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Uncertainty
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of error and uncertainty in measurements, specifically evaluating options (b) and (d) regarding their impact on fractional uncertainty. Participants agree that averaging multiple readings can reduce random error, but there is uncertainty about whether this affects the fractional uncertainty in the same way. The consensus leans towards option (b) being correct, as averaging five readings may yield a smaller average than four, but the implications for fractional uncertainty remain debated. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of measurement accuracy and the need for clarity in question formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fractional uncertainty in measurements
  • Knowledge of averaging techniques in data collection
  • Familiarity with random error concepts
  • Basic principles of measurement accuracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of fractional uncertainty in experimental physics
  • Learn about statistical methods for reducing random error
  • Explore the implications of averaging multiple measurements on accuracy
  • Study the formulation of measurement questions in scientific contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, researchers conducting experiments, and anyone involved in data analysis and measurement accuracy will benefit from this discussion.

songoku
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
394
Homework Statement
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. Checking for zero error in voltmeter before measuring a voltage will help to reduce random error

b. Measuring the timing of a larger number of oscillations will help to reduce the fractional uncertainty of the period

c. Plotting a graph of voltage and current readings for an ohmic device and using its gradient to find resistance will help to eliminate random error

d. In the measurement of the diameter of a sphere, taking more readings and finding the average value of these readings will help to reduce the fractional uncertainty of the diameter
Relevant Equations
Not sure
I know option (a) and (c) are wrong but I don't know the difference between option (b) and (d) because I think they are the same (taking average to get more accurate reading and reduce random error).

My guess is (b) because I think for (d) the fractional uncertainty maybe can stay the same because taking average will reduce random error (the uncertainty) and also can reduce the reading of the diameter (I mean the average of 5 readings will be smaller than average of 4 readings) so the fractional uncertainty (##\frac{\Delta ~ diameter}{diameter}##) stays the same

I am not sure whether my reasoning is correct. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
I mean the average of 5 readings will be smaller than average of 4 readings
No reason why it should ...
(unless the balloon is deflating :smile:)

You sure only one and not two can be correct ?
 
BvU said:
No reason why it should ...
(unless the balloon is deflating :smile:)

You sure only one and not two can be correct ?
Well I can't say I am sure but from all the questions given, usually there is only one correct answer, unless there is something wrong with the question
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K