How to Construct Correlated Normal Variables from Independent Normals?

Click For Summary
To construct correlated normal variables Y1 and Y2 from independent standard normal variables X1 and X2, a linear combination approach is used. The relationships Y1 = s1X1 + m1 and Y2 = bX1 + cX2 + m2 are established, with the condition b² + c² = σ²₂. By setting b = ρσ₂ and c = σ₂(1 - ρ²)^(1/2), the correlation is achieved. The addition of the desired means is straightforward, and the choice to set one coefficient to zero simplifies the problem. This method effectively transforms independent normals into correlated ones while adhering to specified means and variances.
gradnu
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I have two independent standard normal random variables X1,X2. Now I want to construct two new normal random variables Y1,Y2 with mean\mu1, \mu2 and variance (\sigma1)^2, (\sigma2)^2 and correlation \rho.
How do I approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Y1=s1X1+m1
Y2=bX1+cX2+m2
where b2+c2=s22
b=rs2, therefore c=s2(1-r2)1/2
 
Thanks mathman.
But what was your thought process? How did you come up with these relations?
 
gradnu said:
Thanks mathman.
But what was your thought process? How did you come up with these relations?

From long past experience I know that to get correlated normal variables from uncorrrelated standard normal, you just need a linear combination. Adding the desired means is obvious. Also since there are four free coefficients and there are only three conditions, I just set one coefficient to 0.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K