Correlation between Test Scores and Academic Success

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correlation between standardized test scores and academic success, particularly in the fields of math and science. Participants explore the nuances of this relationship, questioning the extent to which test scores predict academic performance and success in various educational contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note a correlation between standardized test scores and academic performance, particularly in math and science, while emphasizing that correlation does not imply causation.
  • Others argue that students who succeed in rigorous courses tend to perform better on tests, but acknowledge that high-performing students can still score poorly on standardized tests.
  • There is mention of hardworking students who may not excel in standardized tests but can achieve success in their careers or academia.
  • One participant questions the existence of any correlation, citing evidence that suggests a lack of correlation across all fields of study and expressing a desire for specific evidence related to math and physics.
  • A reference is made to "The Bell Curve" by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein, which discusses intelligence and its implications for academic success.
  • A link to studies from ETS is provided, which may contain relevant research on the predictive validity of standardized tests for graduate success.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correlation between test scores and academic success, with some asserting a correlation exists while others challenge this notion, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationship between test scores and academic performance, noting that various factors such as course rigor, student intelligence, and work ethic may influence outcomes. There is also a lack of consensus on the existence of a correlation specific to math and physics.

DrewD
Messages
528
Reaction score
28
I recall reading that, while it is not true for all fields, there is a correlation between standardized test scores and academic performance in math and science. I did a quick search, but couldn't find much information that was specific to math and science.

I teach AP Calculus and this subject came up while talking to a student about her performance on tests. Obviously, I told her that she should work hard to do well on the tests, but in the long run, she could be successful even without doing well on the tests. The discussion made me wonder what the research actually shows.

I am mostly interested in a relationship between high school standardized tests (AP, SAT, ACT), but other tests would be interesting as well. I would appreciate any guidance toward relevant research.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, yes - there is correlation between the academic ability of a student and his test scores. But it is not necessarily causation. Students who are in, and succeed in, rigorous courses (AP Chem, AP English, AP Biology, etc.) are going to be better test takers. Students who perform well in school pay more attention.

Alone, it is difficult to predict test scores. Very good students can do poorly on these standardized tests (ie. ACT, SAT, MCAT, LSAT, etc.). Lazier students who are very smart, may get mediocre grades but do great on standardized tests. However, this is a correlation because intelligent students are more likely to be better test takers.
 
Ritzycat said:
However, this is a correlation because intelligent students are more likely to be better test takers.

To add to that, less intelligent, but hardworking students are as likely if not more likely to ultimately be successful in their careers/academia.
 
Is there actually any correlation? There is no point in explaining the correlation before actually showing that there is one. The small amount that I found showed that there is NOT a correlation in general across all fields of study. I am interested in seeing evidence that math and physics have or do not have a correlation before trying to explain why there is a correlation.
 
The correlation is the topic of Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein's The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (1994, Free Press). The book has several appendixes valuable in themselves.
 
DrewD said:
Is there actually any correlation?

ETS has a page with some studies: https://www.ets.org/gre/research/validity_evidence_predicting_grad_success
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K