Cosmic Inflation Explained: Constant Velocity of Electromagnetic Radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of cosmic inflation and the relationship between energy and mass, particularly in the context of the speed of electromagnetic radiation. Participants explore theoretical implications of energy-mass ratios at the time of the Big Bang.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the ratio of energy to mass in the universe could explain cosmic inflation, suggesting that if there was significantly less mass at the moment of the Big Bang, the speed of light (C) would be higher.
  • Another participant argues that in the context of the equation ##E=mc^2##, the term ##c^2## should be viewed merely as a unit conversion factor and cautions against overinterpreting its significance.
  • A third participant reminds others of the forum rules regarding personal theories, indicating that such theories require more rigorous justification.
  • A later reply notes the violation of forum rules regarding personal theories and suggests closing the thread, while acknowledging the point about ##c^2## as a unit conversion factor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of the relationship between energy and mass, with some supporting the initial post's hypothesis and others challenging its validity based on forum guidelines. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is limited by the forum's rules on personal theories, which may restrict the exploration of speculative ideas. There is also an unresolved debate about the implications of ##c^2## beyond its role as a unit conversion factor.

JonathanMFreedman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
C = sqrt(E/M)...this would suppose the ratio of the amount of energy vs. the amount of mass in the universe. If not, why not. If there is no mass, just energy, or much less mass at the moment of the hypothetical Big Bang, then, there C would be significantly higher, thus explaining cosmic inflation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the context of ##E=mc^2##, the ##c^2## is nothing more than a unit conversion factor between units of energy and units of mass. Don't try to read more into it than that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
You might want to take a look at the PF Rules on personal theories. You can't just toss one out and expect us to explain "why not".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and malawi_glenn
The initial post does indeed violate the forum rule about personal theories, so we are closing the thread here.

@Ibix’s point about ##c^2## being just a unit conversion factor is well taken.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, topsquark and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K