Cosmic Slow Down: Is Dark Energy Variable?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skydivephil
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a recent paper suggesting that the acceleration of the universe is slowing down, which raises questions about the nature of dark energy and whether it could be variable rather than a constant. Participants explore the implications of these findings and the robustness of the results presented in the paper.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a paper claiming the universe's acceleration is slowing down and questions the robustness of these results.
  • Another participant expresses a cautious stance, suggesting that the credibility of the authors should be considered, noting the experience of one author compared to the others.
  • A third participant speculates on the implications for the cosmological constant if the findings are confirmed, questioning whether it would indicate that the constant is not truly constant.
  • Another participant critiques the paper for using a limited data set and older reference sets, suggesting that this may hinder the paper's impact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the implications of the findings and the reliability of the data presented in the paper.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations regarding the data set used in the paper and the experience of the authors, which may affect the interpretation of the results.

skydivephil
Messages
470
Reaction score
9
A paper appeared on the arxiv today claiming that the acceleration of the universe is slowing down:

http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/1306.0779

they reference a few other papers also claiming to see the same thing.

How robust do we think these reuslts are? If so what does it mean for dark energy being something variable rather than a cosmological constant?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude on that one. Just as a BTW side observation you might want to look up the authors e.g.
http://inspirehep.net/author/V.H.Cardenas.1/
He's the one whose name I recognize (21 papers, avg. no. cites = 4.0 excl. self-cite)
The other two have no prior papers listed on Inspire.
========================

The paper they CITE is by Starobinsky et al. Starobinsky is well-known and that paper has over 100 cites.
http://inspirehep.net/record/816682?ln=en
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0903.5141

I thought it might be worth looking at the list of cites of the Staro. paper to see which recent papers have RESPONDED to it. I took a quick look and didn't see anything interesting. There was a 2011 paper by Starobinsky himself et al, but it was somewhat more reserved and tentative, or so I thought.

My impression FWIW is that nothing much has come of this so far.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Marcus, I guess that new paper is only out today so we shall see if anyone takes it seriously.
If it were to be confirmed what would it imply for the cosmological constant - not so constant after all? or could we explain the slow down via other effects?
 
Looking over the paper it seems to indicate a variable constant however they used a limitted data set, some of the reference sets were fairly old. So based exclusively on this article I wouldn't think it will go far but that is just my take on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K