Cosmological Constant and Vacuum Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between vacuum energy and the cosmological constant, particularly in the context of cosmological observations. Participants explore whether vacuum energy must exceed the cosmological constant by a significant factor to align with observed phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that vacuum energy must be higher than the cosmological constant by a factor of 10^100 to satisfy observations, suggesting that it could be the opposite.
  • Several participants reference a resource by Baez, indicating it provides a well-presented answer to the topic of vacuum energy and the cosmological constant.
  • There is a general appreciation for Baez's communication style and clarity in explaining complex concepts related to the cosmological constant.
  • Some participants express that they understand the basic ideas presented in the linked resource, indicating a level of comprehension but not necessarily agreement on the implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between vacuum energy and the cosmological constant, with some expressing uncertainty about the claims made regarding their comparative magnitudes.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the definitions and implications of vacuum energy and the cosmological constant, which are not fully resolved. The references to external resources suggest a reliance on those definitions and interpretations.

Quarlep
Messages
257
Reaction score
4
I was reading a book about cosmolgy.And there wrotes vacuum energy must be higher than cosmological constant 10100 times to satisfy (It may just the opposite ) observations. Is that true ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Bandersnatch said:
Have a read through this page for a very well presented answer:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/vacuum.html
Really nice answer! Somehow I had missed seeing that short, clear essay by Baez. One of the most cogent treatments of the CC topic I can think of.
 
marcus said:
Baez
He's a great communicator, isn't he?
 
thanks I understand the basic idea
 
Quarlep said:
thanks I understand the basic idea
That's the usual experimental result one gets from reading Baez:)
@Bandersnatch, thanks for the link, nice one.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Is the Cosmological Constant Problem a Misunderstanding of Zero-Point Energy?
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
10K
High School Matter density right after the decoupling
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Undergrad Age of the Universe and the Cosmological Constant
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Undergrad Is Vacuum Decay from a False to True State Impossible or Just Unlikely?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Undergrad Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Is the Brans-Dicke Vacuum Cosmology Theory Still Relevant?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Black hole mass coupled to expansion -- astrophysical source of dark energy?
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
Undergrad Vacuum up-tunneling with high-energy events?
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Graduate Dark energy = cosmological constant, any problems with that?
  • · Replies 153 ·
6
Replies
153
Views
14K
Undergrad Could cosmic rays induce a vacuum decay in the future?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K