Cosmology vs. Physical Cosmology

Click For Summary
Cosmology and physical cosmology are closely related but distinct fields. Cosmology broadly studies the universe's origin, evolution, and eventual fate, while physical cosmology specifically focuses on the universe's large-scale structure and dynamics. The term "physical" may seem redundant since cosmology is a branch of physics, yet it emphasizes the empirical and observable aspects of the universe. Both fields share overlapping content, as indicated by their separate Wikipedia pages. Understanding these distinctions is essential for grasping the nuances of the universe's study.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Is there a difference between cosmology and physical cosmology? The two have separate wikipedia pages which seem to say essentially the same thing. Also, cosmology is obviously a branch of physics, so is "physical" redundant?
 
Space news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Undergrad Age of the Universe and the Cosmological Constant
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Undergrad Is the Cosmological Constant Problem a Misunderstanding of Zero-Point Energy?
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
8K
Undergrad Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School History of Cosmology: 1915-1929 | Einstein, Hubble & GR
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Undergrad Question about Tong's cosmology lecture notes eqn. 1.19
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad Does the Cosmological Principle in any way underpin Big Bang Theory?
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Undergrad Einstein, Friedman and the cosmological constant
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Observations fit poorly with the Standard Model of Cosmology
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Graduate What are the frontiers of cosmology research?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
High School Which statement is more accurate? (Hubble's redshift vs. Hubble's law)
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K