MHB Cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cotangent of 60° equals 1/tan(60°), which simplifies to 1/sqrt{3}. The discussion centers on the preference for avoiding square roots in the denominator of fractions, as it can complicate addition or subtraction of fractions. While having a square root in the denominator isn't inherently problematic, rationalizing it can simplify calculations. Understanding both methods is beneficial for mathematical proficiency. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the balance between mathematical conventions and practical ease in calculations.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I know that cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}.

Why can't we just leave it as it is? I guess my question is more about algebra than trig.

Yes, my algebra 2 days are far behind. However, back in my algebra 2 days, I never quite understood why math teachers have a problem with square roots in the denominator of a fraction.

What's so bad about a (number)/sqrt{number}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
 
Country Boy said:
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
Understood. Thanks.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top