MHB Cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cotangent of 60° equals 1/tan(60°), which simplifies to 1/sqrt{3}. The discussion centers on the preference for avoiding square roots in the denominator of fractions, as it can complicate addition or subtraction of fractions. While having a square root in the denominator isn't inherently problematic, rationalizing it can simplify calculations. Understanding both methods is beneficial for mathematical proficiency. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the balance between mathematical conventions and practical ease in calculations.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I know that cot (60°) = 1/tan (60°) = 1/sqrt{3}.

Why can't we just leave it as it is? I guess my question is more about algebra than trig.

Yes, my algebra 2 days are far behind. However, back in my algebra 2 days, I never quite understood why math teachers have a problem with square roots in the denominator of a fraction.

What's so bad about a (number)/sqrt{number}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
 
Country Boy said:
It's not the worst thing in the world but it is easier to add or subtract fractions with integer denominators.

However, there are times when it is a good idea to rationalize the numerator. It is a good idea to know how to do it either way!
Understood. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top