Could a full-scale thermonuclear war cause the extinction of the human species?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A full-scale thermonuclear war would likely result in the deaths of billions, potentially reducing the global population by half or three-quarters, but it would not lead to the extinction of the human species. Military supercomputer simulations indicate that while catastrophic, such a conflict would not annihilate all life on Earth. The discussion highlights that even in extreme scenarios, including the use of chemical and biological weapons, total extinction remains unlikely. Historical evidence suggests that life can rebound after significant events, as seen with microbial life surviving past mass extinctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermonuclear warfare and its implications
  • Familiarity with military supercomputer simulations
  • Knowledge of historical mass extinction events
  • Awareness of chemical and biological weaponry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of nuclear warfare on global populations
  • Explore military supercomputer simulation methodologies
  • Study historical cases of life rebounding after mass extinctions
  • Investigate the potential consequences of chemical and biological weapons in warfare
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for military strategists, environmental scientists, historians studying mass extinction events, and policymakers involved in nuclear disarmament and conflict resolution.

The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
If a full scale thermonuclear war were to occur, would it cause the literal extinction of the human species, as well as life on Earth as a whole?

I've read about military supercomputer simulations of this scenario, and does not result in human extinction. Although many Billion people do die. Probably about half or 3/4 of the entire world's population. But not into extinction. Even with the nuclear stockpiles during the peak of the cold war.

Some other things I have read do suggest that such an event would result in total extinction. Especially if chemical and biological weapons are used.

In the distant past, microbial life on Earth beneath the ocean floors has survived impacts by giant meteors, while all other life was annihilated. Within a few Million years, life on Earth was back and thriving.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well unless the two sides fighting the war decided they wanted to also nuke New Zealand, Madagascar, Pacific islands, Iceland, etc. for no particular reason I don't see how.

Maybe if the two sides nuked the whole planet liberally with salted bombs. But I'd imagine at least some people some where would survive. Or perhaps some sort of Dr. Strangelove doomsday device might (e.g. an enormous bomb made underground that was so powerful it could affect the entire planet like a large meteor impact). But these are more the realm of conjecture and fiction. In an actual nuclear war, only the participating countries and their allies would be directly affected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K