Could Aliens Use a Star to Forge the Ultimate Cosmic Weapon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbrothy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser Stellar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical concept of aliens using advanced gravitational control to manipulate a star as a weapon, potentially creating a powerful cosmic laser. Participants engage in speculative reasoning about the feasibility and implications of such a device, touching on theoretical physics and science fiction references.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that aliens could bend space around a star to create a laser-like beam, potentially using gravitational prisms and nebular gas.
  • Others argue that the energy output from such a weapon could be vastly greater than what Earth receives from the Sun, suggesting that nothing short of a black hole would survive its effects.
  • A later reply questions the practicality of using such a device, suggesting that if gravity control were possible, it could lead to even more destructive capabilities.
  • Some participants reference existing science fiction works, such as "Ringworld" and "Footfall," that explore similar themes of advanced weaponry.
  • There are humorous exchanges about the implications of using such a weapon, including lighthearted comments about lighting cigarettes with it.
  • One participant discusses the concept of using nuclear explosions for a gamma-ray laser, drawing parallels to the main topic of star manipulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of speculative ideas without reaching a consensus. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility and implications of using a star as a weapon.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on hypothetical scenarios involving advanced technology and gravitational manipulation, which are not established in current scientific understanding. The discussion includes references to theoretical constructs and speculative engineering challenges.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in speculative physics, science fiction concepts, and theoretical discussions about advanced technologies may find this thread engaging.

sbrothy
Gold Member
Messages
1,446
Reaction score
1,308
This is pretty out there so bear with me. Imagine a brunch of aliens having gravity under fine-grained control. So much so, in fact, that they'd bend space around a star so all the light would be forced around to exit from a circular aperture.No Loss. Furthermore they could bend space in front of the resulting beam in a series of prisms, perhaps even enclose it all in a gravitational LASER tube conveniently trapping some useful nebular gas, in effect creating a chemistry laser.

Such a "device" is probably overkill for most purposes and a Nicholl-Dyson beam would probably look like a flashligt in comparison.

Would anything in the observable universe be safe from such an over-top-weapon?

I'm not much of a writer but it'd be cool (and a little chilling) to read a description of such a weapon being build viewed from a planet in the crosshairs. :)

Any scifi story with a weapon like that in it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sbrothy said:
This is pretty out there so bear with me. Imagine a brunch of aliens having gravity under fine-grained control. So much so, in fact, that they'd bend space around a star so all the light would be forced around to exit from a circular aperture.No Loss. Furthermore they could bend space in front of the resulting beam in a series of prisms, perhaps even enclose it all in a gravitational LASER tube conveniently trapping some useful nebular gas, in effect creating a chemistry laser.

Such a "device" is probably overkill for most purposes and a Nicholl-Dyson beam would probably look like a flashligt in comparison.

Would anything in the observable universe be safe from such an over-top-weapon?

I'm not much of a writer but it'd be cool (and a little chilling) to read a description of such a weapon being build viewed from a planet in the crosshairs. :)

Any scifi story with a weapon like that in it?
Using this technique they could also use a supernova to pump an x-ray laser...
 
sbrothy said:
Would anything in the observable universe be safe from such an over-top-weapon?
The Sun puts out something on the order of 3.8x10^26 watts. The Earth only receives about 1.73x10^14 watts of that. So it would be 12 orders of magnitude more energy than the Earth receives every second. Or, in other words, it would be the equivalent of Earth having a trillion Suns.

I don't think anything short of a black hole would survive for long.
 
And I'd be focusable because of gravity-prisms in front.

EDIT: You could light ssomeones cigarette with the thing. :)
 
sbrothy said:
You could light ssomeones cigarette with the thing. :)
I'm not sure if 'disassociate into its fundamental particles' counts as lighting. :wink:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: MikeeMiracle and DaveC426913
I just now noticed that I wrote a "brunch" of aliens. I hop they have the right chirality, and more to the point I hope they're yummy.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27, hutchphd, Drakkith and 1 other person
Perhaps because because it was part of an assignment but stager things has happened. Just think of films like THX1138.
 
  • #10
sbrothy said:
Any scifi story with a weapon like that in it?
Ringworld, and its sequels.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, sbrothy and hmmm27
  • #11
sbrothy said:
a "brunch" of aliens
It's a cookbook!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm, DaveC426913 and sbrothy
  • #13
glappkaeft said:
Yeah that's why i explicitly mentioned it. Still theyre talking about using a phased array but if you control gravity to, admittedly, cartoonsish levels there'd be none of those pesky thermodynamic laws. Just light following nullvectors (is that a word and more to the point did I use it correctly)...

I know it's way way out there but the problem is one of engineering (or at least one could hope so), as oppssed to unobtanium.
 
  • #14
Now I come to think about it it woud be way to overkill (in more than once sense) If you had that kinda control over gravity you'd propably just
Vanadium 50 said:
It's a cookbook!
Soylent Green. :)
 
  • #15
You're thinking very small here. The Sun puts out a puny 4E26 watts according to that other poster, but it weighs 2E30 kilograms. Multiply that by (3E8 m/s)^2, and now you're talking power. Your gravity control is enough to turn light from a star around 180 degrees, which is to say, you have event horizon capability. Now you just have to herd little chunks of Sun into micro event horizons every yoctosecond, which decay out into Hawking radiation, and thereby (allegedly) you can convert matter into pure energy without needing the antiparticle. Controlling the geometry of how those horizons form should allow you to collimate the light. If anybody wants to hassle you over whether that light is coherent, they're welcome to stand in the beam and take pictures.
 
  • #16
Mike S. said:
You're thinking very small here. The Sun puts out a puny 4E26 watts according to that other poster, but it weighs 2E30 kilograms. Multiply that by (3E8 m/s)^2, and now you're talking power. Your gravity control is enough to turn light from a star around 180 degrees, which is to say, you have event horizon capability. Now you just have to herd little chunks of Sun into micro event horizons every yoctosecond, which decay out into Hawking radiation, and thereby (allegedly) you can convert matter into pure energy without needing the antiparticle. Controlling the geometry of how those horizons form should allow you to collimate the light. If anybody wants to hassle you over whether that light is coherent, they're welcome to stand in the beam and take pictures.
"[...] you just have to [...]". Well, I guess I started the speculating myself. :)
 
  • #17
On a much smaller scale Project Orion designers postulated using nuclear explosions to power a 'grazer' gamma ray 'laser' effect each time the impulse drive fired in space. I forget how they proposed to lens and lase.

Rumor around the Test Site back in the 1970's mentioned using an underground test detonation to power a one-shot grazer or x-ray laser. OP might find some declassified reports or relevant articles.

Many SF authors have featured this idea including Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. See "Footfall".

Guess if one can control the output of an entire star, a grazer seems small potatoes. :cool:
 
  • #18
Vanadium 50 said:
Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!
Quote from the Martian in the Buggs Bunny cartoon if I recall correctly as the Earth obstructs his view of Venus? Damn that dug up some old memories... :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy
  • #19
MikeeMiracle said:
Quote from the Martian in the Buggs Bunny cartoon if I recall correctly as the Earth obstructs his view of Venus? Damn that dug up some old memories... :)
Oh wow. That reference went completely over my head. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K